Skip to main content

IMO 2023 P2

IMO 2023 P2

Well, IMO 2023 Day 1 problems are out and I thought of trying the geometry problem which was P2. 

Problem: Let $ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle with $AB < AC$. Let $\Omega$ be the circumcircle of $ABC$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of the arc $CB$ of $\Omega$ containing $A$. The perpendicular from $A$ to $BC$ meets $BS$ at $D$ and meets $\Omega$ again at $E \neq A$. The line through $D$ parallel to $BC$ meets line $BE$ at $L$. Denote the circumcircle of triangle $BDL$ by $\omega$. Let $\omega$ meet $\Omega$ again at $P \neq B$. Prove that the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$.

Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end!



Proof

Define $A'$ as the antipode of $A$. And redefine $P=A'D\cap (ABC)$. Define $L=SP\cap (PDB)$. 

Claim1: $L-B-E$ collinear
Proof: Note that $$\angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.$$

So $$\angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \angle SPA'=90-(90-A/2-C)=A/2+C\implies \angle LBD=A/2+C\implies \angle LBD=A/2+C.$$

By angle chase, $$\angle DBC=90-A/2,\angle EBC=90-C.$$ So $E-B-L$ collinear.

Claim2: $LD||BC$
Proof: We know that $$\angle EBC=90-C,\angle ELD=\angle BLD=\angle BPD=\angle BPA'=\angle BAO=90-C.$$

So $LD||BC$.

Define $F$ as midpoint of arc $BC$ not containing $A$.

Now define $X=PP\cap AF$. Define $O$ as the circumcenter of $(ABC)$. 

Claim3: $PXOF$ is cyclic
Proof: Let $\angle PAB=\theta$. So $\angle PSB=\theta$ and $\angle PSF=\theta+A/2$. So $\angle POF=2\theta+A$. 

And $\angle PXF=\angle PAX+\angle APX$. But $\angle PAX=\theta+A/2$. And $$\angle APX=\angle APS+\angle SPX=\angle ACS+\angle SPX=90-A/2-C+\angle SPX.$$

So to show cyclicity, we need to show that $$2\theta+A=\angle PXF=90+\theta-C+\angle SPX.$$
Or enough to show $$\angle SPX=\theta+A-90+C.$$

But $$\angle SPX=\angle SPB-\angle XPB$$ 

$$=\angle SAB-\angle XPD-\angle DPB= 90+A/2-\angle DBP-\angle DLB$$

$$=90+A/2-\angle DLP-(90-C)$$

$$=C+A/2-\angle DLP$$

as $SF||AD,BC||LD, AD\perp BC$ we get $$C+A/2-\angle DLP=C+A/2-(90-A/2-\theta)=C+A-90+\theta.$$

And so we get $PXOF$ is cyclic.

Claim4: $XA=XP$
Proof: Note that $$\angle XPA=\angle PXF-\angle PAX=2\theta+A-\theta-A/2=\theta+A/2$$. So $\angle XPA=\angle XAP$. And hence the claim.

But $$XA^2=XP^2=XD\cdot XB.$$ So $XA$ is tangent to $(DBA)$. Hence $$\angle ABD=\angle DAS=\angle DAF=\angle AFS=\angle ABS.$$

And hence we get $B-X-S$ collinear.

And we are done!


This was my proof when I first tried the problem. I won't call this a "proof" but rather "raw progress which somehow manage to finish the problem". I am someone who writes every single observation on paper, and this was how my mind was working tbh. 

As you can see, claim 3 is not needed and we can directly show $XA=XP$ but I still added it. 



My rough diagram

As soon as I made the diagram, I conjecture $L-P-S$ must be collinear. But then point $P$ was still weird you know. To show that "the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$", we had to introduce the arc midpoint of $BC$ and hence $F$ was introduced. Point $O$ was introduced because I was using a compass and had to mark point $O$ and then realised $AO,PD$ concur at the circle. And then the rest conjectures followed very intuitively. 

Additionally, my initial idea for claim 4 was to show $OX||PA'$ and that would finish it. I believe there is an angle chase to it, but I didn't do it as I was lazy.

I personally think the problem is a G3/G4 level. There are basically three claims for this problem, showing $L-P-S$, $D-P-A'$ and $XP=XA$ and then you use Power of point to finish it.

Well, it was a cute problem! I hope you guys tried it too! :). What was your solution to this problem?

~Sunaina



Comments

  1. Klavi3rJanuary 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM

    What's the comment section doing filled with garbage ads lol

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Geometry ( Finally!!!)

 This is just such an unfair blog.  Like if one goes through this blog, one can notice how dominated  Algebra is!! Like 6 out of 9 blog post is Algebra dominated -_- Where as I am not a fan of Algebra, compared to other genres of Olympiad Math(as of now). And this was just injustice for Synthetic Geo. So this time , go geo!!!!!!!!!!!  These problems are randomly from A Beautiful Journey through Olympiad Geometry.  Also perhaps I will post geo after March, because I am studying combi.  Problem:  Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle where $\angle BAC = 60^{\circ}$. Prove that if the Euler’s line of $\triangle ABC$ intersects $AB$ and $AC$ at $D$ and $E$, respectively, then $\triangle ADE$ is equilateral. Solution:  Since $\angle A=60^{\circ}$ , we get $AH=2R\cos A=R=AO$. So $\angle EHA=\angle DOA.$ Also it's well known that $H$ and $O $ isogonal conjugates.$\angle OAD =\angle EAH.$ By $ASA$ congruence, we get $AE=AD.$ Hence $\triangle ADE$ is equilateral....
3 comments
Read more

Just spam combo problems cause why not

This post is mainly for Rohan Bhaiya. He gave me/EGMO contestants a lot and lots of problems. Here are solutions to a very few of them.  To Rohan Bhaiya: I just wrote the sketch/proofs here cause why not :P. I did a few more extra problems so yeah.  I sort of sorted the problems into different sub-areas, but it's just better to try all of them! I did try some more combo problems outside this but I tried them in my tablet and worked there itself. So latexing was tough. Algorithms  "Just find the algorithm" they said and they died.  References:  Algorithms Pset by Abhay Bestrapalli Algorithms by Cody Johnson Problem1: Suppose the positive integer $n$ is odd. First Al writes the numbers $1, 2,\dots, 2n$ on the blackboard. Then he picks any two numbers $a, b$ erases them, and writes, instead, $|a - b|$. Prove that an odd number will remain at the end.  Proof: Well, we go $\mod 2$. Note that $$|a-b|\equiv a+b\mod 2\implies \text{ the final number is }1+2+\dots ...
2 comments
Read more

My experiences at EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience

Yes, I know. This post should have been posted like 2 months ago. Okay okay, sorry. But yeah, I was just waiting for everything to be over and I was lazy. ( sorry ) You know, the transitioning period from high school to college is very weird. I will join CMI( Chennai Mathematical  Institue) for bsc maths and cs degree. And I am very scared. Like very very scared. No, not about making new friends and all. I don't care about that part because I know a decent amount of CMI people already.  What I am scared of is whether I will be able to handle the coursework and get good grades T_T Anyways, here's my EGMO PDC, EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience. Yes, a lot of stuff. My EGMO experience is a lot and I wrote a lot of details, IMOTC and PROMYS is just a few paras. Oh to those, who don't know me or are reading for the first time. I am Sunaina Pati. I was IND2 at EGMO 2023 which was held in Slovenia. I was also invited to the IMOTC or International Mathematical Olympiad Training Cam...
11 comments
Read more

Problems I did this week [Jan8-Jan14]

Yeyy!! I am being so consistent with my posts~~ Here are a few problems I did the past week and yeah INMO going to happen soon :) All the best to everyone who is writing!  I wont be trying any new problems and will simply revise stuffs :) Some problems here are hard. Try them yourself and yeah~~Solutions (with sources) are given at the end! Problems discussed in the blog post Problem1: Let $ABC$ be a triangle whose incircle $\omega$ touches sides $BC, CA, AB$ at $D,E,F$ respectively. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of $DEF$ and let altitude $DH$ intersect $\omega$ again at $P$ and $EF$ intersect $BC$ at $L$. Let the circumcircle of $BPC$ intersect $\omega$ again at $X$. Prove that points $L,D,H,X$ are concyclic. Problem 2: Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrangle, $ P$ the intersection of lines $ AB$ and $ CD$, $ Q$ the intersection of lines $ AD$ and $ BC$ and $ O$ the intersection of diagonals $ AC$ and $ BD$. Show that if $ \angle POQ= 90^\circ$ then $ PO$ is the bisector of $ \angle AOD$ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Let's complex bash Part 1

I have to learn complex bash. And almost everyone knows that I am notes taking girl so thought why not make a post on complex bash ( so that I don't get emotionally demotivated lol).😇 There wasn't any need for learning complex bash, but it was in my dream checklist i.e " To learn a bash." And since I am not loaded with exams, I think it's high time to learn Bash and new topics.  Also if anyone from the "anti-bash" community is reading, sorry in advance and R.I.P.  Notes:- 1. Complex numbers are of the form $z=a+ib,$ where $a$ and $b$ are real numbers and $i^2=-1.$ 2. In polar form, $z=r(\cos \theta+~~i\sin\theta)=~~re^{i\theta},$ where $r=~~|z|=~~\sqrt{a^2+b^2},$ which is called the magnitude. 3. Here we used euler's formula i.e $\cos \theta+~~i\sin\theta=~~e^{i\theta}.$ 4. The $\theta $ is called the argument of $z,$ denored $\arg z.$ ( $\theta$ can be considered in $\mod 360$ and it is  measured anti-clockwise). 5. The complex conjugate of $z$ is ...
4 comments
Read more

Orders and Primitive roots

 Theory  We know what Fermat's little theorem states. If $p$ is a prime number, then for any integer $a$, the number $a^p − a$ is an integer multiple of $p$. In the notation of modular arithmetic, this is expressed as \[a^{p}\equiv a{\pmod {p}}.\] So, essentially, for every $(a,m)=1$, ${a}^{\phi (m)}\equiv 1 \pmod {m}$. But $\phi (m)$ isn't necessarily the smallest exponent. For example, we know $4^{12}\equiv 1\mod 13$ but so is $4^6$. So, we care about the "smallest" exponent $d$ such that $a^d\equiv 1\mod m$ given $(a,m)=1$.  Orders Given a prime $p$, the order of an integer $a$ modulo $p$, $p\nmid a$, is the smallest positive integer $d$, such that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod p$. This is denoted $\text{ord}_p(a) = d$. If $p$ is a primes and $p\nmid a$, let $d$ be order of $a$ mod $p$. Then $a^n\equiv 1\pmod p\implies d|n$. Let $n=pd+r, r\ll d$. Which implies $a^r\equiv 1\pmod p.$ But $d$ is the smallest natural number. So $r=0$. So $d|n$. Show that $n$ divid...
7 comments
Read more

Solving Random ISLs And Sharygin Solutions! And INMO happened!!

Some of the ISLs I did before INMO :P  [2005 G3]:  Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. A variable line $g$ through the vertex $A$ intersects the rays $BC$ and $DC$ at the points $X$ and $Y$, respectively. Let $K$ and $L$ be the $A$-excenters of the triangles $ABX$ and $ADY$. Show that the angle $\measuredangle KCL$ is independent of the line $g$ Solution: Note that $$\Delta LDK \sim \Delta XBK$$ and $$\Delta ADY\sim \Delta XCY.$$ So we have $$\frac{BK}{DY}=\frac{XK}{LY}$$ and $$\frac{DY}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}=\frac{AY}{XY}.$$ Hence $$\frac{BK}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}\implies \frac{BK}{BC}=\frac{CY}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}=\frac{AB}{BC}\times \frac{XK}{LY} $$ $$\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{XK}{BK}=\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{LY}{DY}=\frac{AB}{DL}$$ $$\implies \Delta CBK\sim \Delta LDK$$ And we are done. We get that $$\angle KCL=360-(\angle ACB+\angle DKC+\angle BCK)=\angle DAB/2 +180-\angle DAB=180-\angle DAB/2$$ Motivation: I took a hint on this. I had other angles but I did...
4 comments
Read more

How to prepare for RMO?

"Let's wait for this exam to get over".. *Proceeds to wait for 2 whole fricking years!  I always wanted to write a book recommendation list, because I have been asked so many times! But then I was always like "Let's wait for this exam to get over" and so on. Why? You see it's pretty embarrassing to write a "How to prepare for RMO/INMO" post and then proceed to "fail" i.e not qualifying.  Okay okay, you might be thinking, "Sunaina you qualified like in 10th grade itself, you will obviously qualify in 11th and 12th grade." No. It's not that easy. Plus you are talking to a very underconfident girl. I have always underestimated myself. And I think that's the worst thing one can do itself. Am I confident about myself now? Definitely not but I am learning not to self-depreciate myself little by little. Okay, I shall write more about it in the next post describing my experience in 3 different camps and 1 program.  So, I got...
7 comments
Read more

Number Theory Revise part 1

I thought to revise David Burton and try out some problems which I didn't do. It's been almost 2 years since I touched that book so let's see! Also, this set of problems/notes is quite weird since it's actually a memory lane. You will get to know on your own! I started with proving a problem, remembered another problem and then another and so on! It was quite fun cause all these questions were the ones I really wanted to solve! And this is part1 or else the post would be too long. Problem1: Prove that for $n\ge 1$  $$\binom{n}{r}<\binom{n}{r+1}$$ iff $0\le r\le \frac{n-1}{2}$ Proof: We show that $\binom{n}{r}<\binom{n}{r+1}$ for $0\le r\le \frac{n-1}{2}$ and use the fact that $$\binom{n}{n-r}=\binom{n}{r}$$ Note that $\binom{n}{r}= \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}, \binom{n}{r+1}=\frac{n!}{(r+1)!(n-r-1)!}$  Comparing, it's enough to show that $$\frac{1}{n-r}<\frac{1}{r+1}\text{ or show } n-r>r+1$$ which is true as $0\le r\le \frac{n-1}{2}$ Problem2: Show that the exp...
8 comments
Read more