IMO 2023 P2
Problem: Let ABC be an acute-angled triangle with AB < AC. Let \Omega be the circumcircle of ABC. Let S be the midpoint of the arc CB of \Omega containing A. The perpendicular from A to BC meets BS at D and meets \Omega again at E \neq A. The line through D parallel to BC meets line BE at L. Denote the circumcircle of triangle BDL by \omega. Let \omega meet \Omega again at P \neq B. Prove that the line tangent to \omega at P meets line BS on the internal angle bisector of \angle BAC.
Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end!
Proof
Define A' as the antipode of A. And redefine P=A'D\cap (ABC). Define L=SP\cap (PDB).
Claim1: L-B-E collinear
Proof: Note that \angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.
So \angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \angle SPA'=90-(90-A/2-C)=A/2+C\implies \angle LBD=A/2+C\implies \angle LBD=A/2+C.
By angle chase, \angle DBC=90-A/2,\angle EBC=90-C.
Claim2: LD||BC
Proof: We know that \angle EBC=90-C,\angle ELD=\angle BLD=\angle BPD=\angle BPA'=\angle BAO=90-C.
So LD||BC.
Define F as midpoint of arc BC not containing A.
Now define X=PP\cap AF. Define O as the circumcenter of (ABC).
Claim3: PXOF is cyclic
Proof: Let \angle PAB=\theta. So \angle PSB=\theta and \angle PSF=\theta+A/2. So \angle POF=2\theta+A.
And \angle PXF=\angle PAX+\angle APX. But \angle PAX=\theta+A/2. And \angle APX=\angle APS+\angle SPX=\angle ACS+\angle SPX=90-A/2-C+\angle SPX.
So to show cyclicity, we need to show that 2\theta+A=\angle PXF=90+\theta-C+\angle SPX.
Or enough to show \angle SPX=\theta+A-90+C.
But \angle SPX=\angle SPB-\angle XPB
=\angle SAB-\angle XPD-\angle DPB= 90+A/2-\angle DBP-\angle DLB
=90+A/2-\angle DLP-(90-C)
=C+A/2-\angle DLP
as SF||AD,BC||LD, AD\perp BC we get C+A/2-\angle DLP=C+A/2-(90-A/2-\theta)=C+A-90+\theta.
And so we get PXOF is cyclic.
Claim4: XA=XP
Proof: Note that \angle XPA=\angle PXF-\angle PAX=2\theta+A-\theta-A/2=\theta+A/2
But XA^2=XP^2=XD\cdot XB.
And hence we get B-X-S collinear.
And we are done!
This was my proof when I first tried the problem. I won't call this a "proof" but rather "raw progress which somehow manage to finish the problem". I am someone who writes every single observation on paper, and this was how my mind was working tbh.
As you can see, claim 3 is not needed and we can directly show XA=XP but I still added it.
As soon as I made the diagram, I conjecture L-P-S must be collinear. But then point P was still weird you know. To show that "the line tangent to \omega at P meets line BS on the internal angle bisector of \angle BAC", we had to introduce the arc midpoint of BC and hence F was introduced. Point O was introduced because I was using a compass and had to mark point O and then realised AO,PD concur at the circle. And then the rest conjectures followed very intuitively.
Additionally, my initial idea for claim 4 was to show OX||PA' and that would finish it. I believe there is an angle chase to it, but I didn't do it as I was lazy.
I personally think the problem is a G3/G4 level. There are basically three claims for this problem, showing L-P-S, D-P-A' and XP=XA and then you use Power of point to finish it.
Well, it was a cute problem! I hope you guys tried it too! :). What was your solution to this problem?
~Sunaina
What's the comment section doing filled with garbage ads lol
ReplyDelete