IMO 2023 P2
Problem: Let $ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle with $AB < AC$. Let $\Omega$ be the circumcircle of $ABC$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of the arc $CB$ of $\Omega$ containing $A$. The perpendicular from $A$ to $BC$ meets $BS$ at $D$ and meets $\Omega$ again at $E \neq A$. The line through $D$ parallel to $BC$ meets line $BE$ at $L$. Denote the circumcircle of triangle $BDL$ by $\omega$. Let $\omega$ meet $\Omega$ again at $P \neq B$. Prove that the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$.
Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end!
Proof
Define $A'$ as the antipode of $A$. And redefine $P=A'D\cap (ABC)$. Define $L=SP\cap (PDB)$.
Claim1: $L-B-E$ collinear
Proof: Note that $$\angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.$$
So $$\angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \angle SPA'=90-(90-A/2-C)=A/2+C\implies \angle LBD=A/2+C\implies \angle LBD=A/2+C.$$
By angle chase, $$\angle DBC=90-A/2,\angle EBC=90-C.$$ So $E-B-L$ collinear.
Claim2: $LD||BC$
Proof: We know that $$\angle EBC=90-C,\angle ELD=\angle BLD=\angle BPD=\angle BPA'=\angle BAO=90-C.$$
So $LD||BC$.
Define $F$ as midpoint of arc $BC$ not containing $A$.
Now define $X=PP\cap AF$. Define $O$ as the circumcenter of $(ABC)$.
Claim3: $PXOF$ is cyclic
Proof: Let $\angle PAB=\theta$. So $\angle PSB=\theta$ and $\angle PSF=\theta+A/2$. So $\angle POF=2\theta+A$.
And $\angle PXF=\angle PAX+\angle APX$. But $\angle PAX=\theta+A/2$. And $$\angle APX=\angle APS+\angle SPX=\angle ACS+\angle SPX=90-A/2-C+\angle SPX.$$
So to show cyclicity, we need to show that $$2\theta+A=\angle PXF=90+\theta-C+\angle SPX.$$
Or enough to show $$\angle SPX=\theta+A-90+C.$$
But $$\angle SPX=\angle SPB-\angle XPB$$
$$=\angle SAB-\angle XPD-\angle DPB= 90+A/2-\angle DBP-\angle DLB$$
$$=90+A/2-\angle DLP-(90-C)$$
$$=C+A/2-\angle DLP$$
as $SF||AD,BC||LD, AD\perp BC$ we get $$C+A/2-\angle DLP=C+A/2-(90-A/2-\theta)=C+A-90+\theta.$$
And so we get $PXOF$ is cyclic.
Claim4: $XA=XP$
Proof: Note that $$\angle XPA=\angle PXF-\angle PAX=2\theta+A-\theta-A/2=\theta+A/2$$. So $\angle XPA=\angle XAP$. And hence the claim.
But $$XA^2=XP^2=XD\cdot XB.$$ So $XA$ is tangent to $(DBA)$. Hence $$\angle ABD=\angle DAS=\angle DAF=\angle AFS=\angle ABS.$$
And hence we get $B-X-S$ collinear.
And we are done!
This was my proof when I first tried the problem. I won't call this a "proof" but rather "raw progress which somehow manage to finish the problem". I am someone who writes every single observation on paper, and this was how my mind was working tbh.
As you can see, claim 3 is not needed and we can directly show $XA=XP$ but I still added it.
As soon as I made the diagram, I conjecture $L-P-S$ must be collinear. But then point $P$ was still weird you know. To show that "the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$", we had to introduce the arc midpoint of $BC$ and hence $F$ was introduced. Point $O$ was introduced because I was using a compass and had to mark point $O$ and then realised $AO,PD$ concur at the circle. And then the rest conjectures followed very intuitively.
Additionally, my initial idea for claim 4 was to show $OX||PA'$ and that would finish it. I believe there is an angle chase to it, but I didn't do it as I was lazy.
I personally think the problem is a G3/G4 level. There are basically three claims for this problem, showing $L-P-S$, $D-P-A'$ and $XP=XA$ and then you use Power of point to finish it.
Well, it was a cute problem! I hope you guys tried it too! :). What was your solution to this problem?
~Sunaina


What's the comment section doing filled with garbage ads lol
ReplyDeleteReally interesting set of geometry problems—especially the midpoint and altitude ones. These are great for building strong fundamentals.
ReplyDeleteWhile practicing math, I also try to connect concepts with real-life applications. For example, I sometimes use a
compound interest calculator
to understand how exponential growth works in practice, which nicely complements algebraic thinking.
Looking forward to more such problems!