Skip to main content

Symmetric Polynomials #week 6

Well...
I haven't seen much symmetric polynomials in Olympiads, but still I am learning, because I found them cute. And I am basically using this blog as my notes :P

What are symmetric polynomials? 

One can understand this with  examples. If we are considering over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then 
$$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3=x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3+x_1^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_3+x_2^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_1+x_3^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_2.$$

See? $3!$ terms! Let's take one more example with again over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then

$$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^2= x_1^2\cdot x_2^2+x_1^2\cdot x_3^2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^2+x_2^2\cdot x_3^2+x_3^2\cdot x_1^2+x_3^2\cdot x_2^2$$

Wait.. why 2 times ? So basically what happens in symmetrictric sums, is we go through all $n!$ possible permutations. So, here we have $a^2\cdot b^2\cdot c^0$ as like the "general" form type, right? Now, list down all the $3!=6$ permutations of $x_1,x_2,x_3$, and put them in the general form, and then we sum it up.

So all possible permutations and then putting in the general form we get ,

${x_1,x_2,x_3}\rightarrow  x_1^2\cdot x_2^2$

${x_1,x_3,x_2}\rightarrow  x_1^2\cdot x_3^2$

${x_2,x_1,x_3}\rightarrow x_2^2\cdot x_1^2$

${x_2,x_3,x_1}\rightarrow x_2^2\cdot x_3^2$

${x_3,x_1,x_2}\rightarrow x_3^2\cdot x_1^2$

${x_3,x_2,x_1}\rightarrow x_3^2\cdot x_3^2$

Okie! Summing them and we will get the symmetric sums. So this makes sense I hope?

One thing to be noted is to not get confused between cyclic sums and symmetric sums.

To make things clear, Cyclic sums have only $n$ terms whereas in symmetric sums, we have $n!$ terms.

Let's go through another example , which I hope will perhaps clear this thing.

So considering  over $4$ variables, we get $$\sum_{cyc}x_1^2\cdot x_2=x_1^2\cdot x_2+x_2^2\cdot x_3+x_3^2\cdot x_4+x_4^2\cdot x_1.$$ 

See $4$ terms rights? and we are summing it in "cycle" types. 

Well, if you are still confused then go through OTIS excerpts, it's really nice!

Elementary Symmetric Polynomials:

Nothing fancy here, just viettas with no signs type. 

The elementary symmetric polynomials in $n$ variables $x_1,x_2,\dots x_n$ can be defined as 

$$\sigma_1= \sum x_i$$

$$\sigma_2= \sum_{i<j} x_i\cdot x_j$$

$$\sigma_3=\sum_{i<j<k} x_i\cdot x_j\cdot x_k$$ 

and so on with $$\sigma_n= x_1\cdot x_2 \dots x_n$$

Fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials:

The fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials states that any symmetric polynomial in n variables can be expressed  by a polynomial expression in terms of these elementary symmetric polynomials (uniquely).

And now we are going to take a lot of examples to verify this theorem !!! Oh, and why am I doing that? Again, I like to understand what's happening :P.

$$a^2+b^2+c^2=(a+b+c)^2-2(ab+bc+ca)={\sigma_1}^2-2\cdot \sigma_2$$

$$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)=(a+b)({a+b}^2-3ab)=\sigma_1\cdot (\sigma_1^2-3\sigma_2)=\sigma_1 ^3-3\cdot \sigma_1\cdot \sigma_2$$

$$a^3+b^3+c^3=(a+b+c)^3 -3(\sum_{sym}a^2b)-6(abc)$$ $$=(a+b+c)^3-3(a+b+c)(ab+bc+ca)+9abc-6abc=\sigma_1^3-3\cdot \sigma_1\cdot \sigma_2+3\sigma_3$$

Okie this much was fine.. let's try $a^4+b^4+c^4$. So,
 $$a^4+b^4+c^4=(a+b+c)^4- 4(a^2+b^2+c^2)(ab+ca+bc)- 8(abc)(a+b+c)$$ $$=\sigma_1^4 -4({\sigma_1}^2-2\cdot \sigma_2)\cdot \sigma_2-8\sigma_3\cdot \sigma_1$$

These were simple.. now what about $\sum_{sym}x_1^2x_2x_3$ ? Note that,

$$2 \sum_{sym}x_1^2x_2x_3=2(\sum_{cyc}x_1x_2)^2- 2(\sum_{cyc}x_1^2x_2^2)=2\sigma_2^2-(x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2)^2 + (x_1^4+x_2^4+x_3^4)$$ $$= 2\sigma_2^2- [{\sigma_1}^2-2\cdot \sigma_2]^2+[\sigma_1^4 -4({\sigma_1}^2-2\cdot \sigma_2)\cdot \sigma_2-8\sigma_3\cdot \sigma_1]$$

Okie.. this looks fine to me.. but too tiresome.. T_T. I might have made some mistake :(

Newton Sums:

It's given in AOPS wiki

So we can basically find out any $x_1^d+\dots+x_n^d$, recursively using this 

$$a^n+b^n+c^n=(a+b+c)(a^{n-1}+b^{n-1}+c^{n-1})-(ab+bc+ca)(a^{n-2}+b^{n-2}+c^{n-2})+abc(a^{n-3}+b^{n-3}+c^{n-3}).$$

So this guarantees that we can express in the elementary symmetric polynomials form, however I am not quite sure about the uniqueness.. 

Yeah so that's it for today! I will do some problem solving now!

Sunaina💜

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Geometry ( Finally!!!)

 This is just such an unfair blog.  Like if one goes through this blog, one can notice how dominated  Algebra is!! Like 6 out of 9 blog post is Algebra dominated -_- Where as I am not a fan of Algebra, compared to other genres of Olympiad Math(as of now). And this was just injustice for Synthetic Geo. So this time , go geo!!!!!!!!!!!  These problems are randomly from A Beautiful Journey through Olympiad Geometry.  Also perhaps I will post geo after March, because I am studying combi.  Problem:  Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle where $\angle BAC = 60^{\circ}$. Prove that if the Euler’s line of $\triangle ABC$ intersects $AB$ and $AC$ at $D$ and $E$, respectively, then $\triangle ADE$ is equilateral. Solution:  Since $\angle A=60^{\circ}$ , we get $AH=2R\cos A=R=AO$. So $\angle EHA=\angle DOA.$ Also it's well known that $H$ and $O $ isogonal conjugates.$\angle OAD =\angle EAH.$ By $ASA$ congruence, we get $AE=AD.$ Hence $\triangle ADE$ is equilateral....

Problems I did this week [Jan8-Jan14]

Yeyy!! I am being so consistent with my posts~~ Here are a few problems I did the past week and yeah INMO going to happen soon :) All the best to everyone who is writing!  I wont be trying any new problems and will simply revise stuffs :) Some problems here are hard. Try them yourself and yeah~~Solutions (with sources) are given at the end! Problems discussed in the blog post Problem1: Let $ABC$ be a triangle whose incircle $\omega$ touches sides $BC, CA, AB$ at $D,E,F$ respectively. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of $DEF$ and let altitude $DH$ intersect $\omega$ again at $P$ and $EF$ intersect $BC$ at $L$. Let the circumcircle of $BPC$ intersect $\omega$ again at $X$. Prove that points $L,D,H,X$ are concyclic. Problem 2: Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrangle, $ P$ the intersection of lines $ AB$ and $ CD$, $ Q$ the intersection of lines $ AD$ and $ BC$ and $ O$ the intersection of diagonals $ AC$ and $ BD$. Show that if $ \angle POQ= 90^\circ$ then $ PO$ is the bisector of $ \angle AOD$ ...

Just spam combo problems cause why not

This post is mainly for Rohan Bhaiya. He gave me/EGMO contestants a lot and lots of problems. Here are solutions to a very few of them.  To Rohan Bhaiya: I just wrote the sketch/proofs here cause why not :P. I did a few more extra problems so yeah.  I sort of sorted the problems into different sub-areas, but it's just better to try all of them! I did try some more combo problems outside this but I tried them in my tablet and worked there itself. So latexing was tough. Algorithms  "Just find the algorithm" they said and they died.  References:  Algorithms Pset by Abhay Bestrapalli Algorithms by Cody Johnson Problem1: Suppose the positive integer $n$ is odd. First Al writes the numbers $1, 2,\dots, 2n$ on the blackboard. Then he picks any two numbers $a, b$ erases them, and writes, instead, $|a - b|$. Prove that an odd number will remain at the end.  Proof: Well, we go $\mod 2$. Note that $$|a-b|\equiv a+b\mod 2\implies \text{ the final number is }1+2+\dots ...

My experiences at EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience

Yes, I know. This post should have been posted like 2 months ago. Okay okay, sorry. But yeah, I was just waiting for everything to be over and I was lazy. ( sorry ) You know, the transitioning period from high school to college is very weird. I will join CMI( Chennai Mathematical  Institue) for bsc maths and cs degree. And I am very scared. Like very very scared. No, not about making new friends and all. I don't care about that part because I know a decent amount of CMI people already.  What I am scared of is whether I will be able to handle the coursework and get good grades T_T Anyways, here's my EGMO PDC, EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience. Yes, a lot of stuff. My EGMO experience is a lot and I wrote a lot of details, IMOTC and PROMYS is just a few paras. Oh to those, who don't know me or are reading for the first time. I am Sunaina Pati. I was IND2 at EGMO 2023 which was held in Slovenia. I was also invited to the IMOTC or International Mathematical Olympiad Training Cam...

IMO 2023 P2

IMO 2023 P2 Well, IMO 2023 Day 1 problems are out and I thought of trying the geometry problem which was P2.  Problem: Let $ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle with $AB < AC$. Let $\Omega$ be the circumcircle of $ABC$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of the arc $CB$ of $\Omega$ containing $A$. The perpendicular from $A$ to $BC$ meets $BS$ at $D$ and meets $\Omega$ again at $E \neq A$. The line through $D$ parallel to $BC$ meets line $BE$ at $L$. Denote the circumcircle of triangle $BDL$ by $\omega$. Let $\omega$ meet $\Omega$ again at $P \neq B$. Prove that the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$. Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end! Proof Define $A'$ as the antipode of $A$. And redefine $P=A'D\cap (ABC)$. Define $L=SP\cap (PDB)$.  Claim1: $L-B-E$ collinear Proof: Note that $$\angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.$$ So $$\angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \ang...

Solving Random ISLs And Sharygin Solutions! And INMO happened!!

Some of the ISLs I did before INMO :P  [2005 G3]:  Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. A variable line $g$ through the vertex $A$ intersects the rays $BC$ and $DC$ at the points $X$ and $Y$, respectively. Let $K$ and $L$ be the $A$-excenters of the triangles $ABX$ and $ADY$. Show that the angle $\measuredangle KCL$ is independent of the line $g$ Solution: Note that $$\Delta LDK \sim \Delta XBK$$ and $$\Delta ADY\sim \Delta XCY.$$ So we have $$\frac{BK}{DY}=\frac{XK}{LY}$$ and $$\frac{DY}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}=\frac{AY}{XY}.$$ Hence $$\frac{BK}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}\implies \frac{BK}{BC}=\frac{CY}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}=\frac{AB}{BC}\times \frac{XK}{LY} $$ $$\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{XK}{BK}=\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{LY}{DY}=\frac{AB}{DL}$$ $$\implies \Delta CBK\sim \Delta LDK$$ And we are done. We get that $$\angle KCL=360-(\angle ACB+\angle DKC+\angle BCK)=\angle DAB/2 +180-\angle DAB=180-\angle DAB/2$$ Motivation: I took a hint on this. I had other angles but I did...

Introduction

  Hey Everyone!! This is my first Blog post. So let me give a brief introduction about myself. I am Sunaina Pati. I love solving Olympiad math problems,  learning crazy astronomical facts , playing hanabi and anti-chess, listening to Kpop , love making diagrams in Geogebra and  teaching other people maths 😊 . I love geometry , number theory and Combinatorics . I am starting this blog to keep myself a bit motivated in doing studies 😎 . Right now, I am planning to write walkthroughs on some of the best problems I tried over the week which can refer for hints 'cause solutions contain some major spoilers and one learns a lot while solving the problem on his own rather than seeing solutions . Also, there will be some reviews about Kpop songs, study techniques, my day to day lifestyles,exam reviews and ofc some non-sense surprises 😂.  I am planning to  try  posting every week on Sundays or Saturdays ( most probably) ! Though there is no guarantee about when I ...

Orders and Primitive roots

 Theory  We know what Fermat's little theorem states. If $p$ is a prime number, then for any integer $a$, the number $a^p − a$ is an integer multiple of $p$. In the notation of modular arithmetic, this is expressed as \[a^{p}\equiv a{\pmod {p}}.\] So, essentially, for every $(a,m)=1$, ${a}^{\phi (m)}\equiv 1 \pmod {m}$. But $\phi (m)$ isn't necessarily the smallest exponent. For example, we know $4^{12}\equiv 1\mod 13$ but so is $4^6$. So, we care about the "smallest" exponent $d$ such that $a^d\equiv 1\mod m$ given $(a,m)=1$.  Orders Given a prime $p$, the order of an integer $a$ modulo $p$, $p\nmid a$, is the smallest positive integer $d$, such that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod p$. This is denoted $\text{ord}_p(a) = d$. If $p$ is a primes and $p\nmid a$, let $d$ be order of $a$ mod $p$. Then $a^n\equiv 1\pmod p\implies d|n$. Let $n=pd+r, r\ll d$. Which implies $a^r\equiv 1\pmod p.$ But $d$ is the smallest natural number. So $r=0$. So $d|n$. Show that $n$ divid...

Challenging myself? [Jan 15-Jan 27]

Ehh INMO was trash. I think I will get 17/0/0/0-1/3-5/10-14, which is def not good enough for qualifying from 12th grade. Well, I really feel sad but let's not talk about it and focus on EGMO rather.  INMO 2023 P1 Let $S$ be a finite set of positive integers. Assume that there are precisely 2023 ordered pairs $(x,y)$ in $S\times S$ so that the product $xy$ is a perfect square. Prove that one can find at least four distinct elements in $S$ so that none of their pairwise products is a perfect square. I will use Atul's sol, cause it's the exact same as mine.  Proof: Consider the graph $G$ induced by the elements of $S$ and edges being if the products are perfect squares. Note that if $xy = a^2$ and $xz = b^2$, then $yz = \left( \frac{ab}{x} \right)^2$, since its an integer and square of a rational number its a perfect square and so $yz$ is an edge too. So the graph is a bunch of disjoint cliques, say with sizes $c_1, c_2, \cdots, c_k$. Then $\sum_{i=1}^k c_i^2 = 2023$, which ...

Let's complex bash Part 1

I have to learn complex bash. And almost everyone knows that I am notes taking girl so thought why not make a post on complex bash ( so that I don't get emotionally demotivated lol).😇 There wasn't any need for learning complex bash, but it was in my dream checklist i.e " To learn a bash." And since I am not loaded with exams, I think it's high time to learn Bash and new topics.  Also if anyone from the "anti-bash" community is reading, sorry in advance and R.I.P.  Notes:- 1. Complex numbers are of the form $z=a+ib,$ where $a$ and $b$ are real numbers and $i^2=-1.$ 2. In polar form, $z=r(\cos \theta+~~i\sin\theta)=~~re^{i\theta},$ where $r=~~|z|=~~\sqrt{a^2+b^2},$ which is called the magnitude. 3. Here we used euler's formula i.e $\cos \theta+~~i\sin\theta=~~e^{i\theta}.$ 4. The $\theta $ is called the argument of $z,$ denored $\arg z.$ ( $\theta$ can be considered in $\mod 360$ and it is  measured anti-clockwise). 5. The complex conjugate of $z$ is ...