Processing math: 100%
Skip to main content

Challenging myself? [Jan 15-Jan 27]

Ehh INMO was trash. I think I will get 17/0/0/0-1/3-5/10-14, which is def not good enough for qualifying from 12th grade. Well, I really feel sad but let's not talk about it and focus on EGMO rather. 

INMO 2023 P1

Let S be a finite set of positive integers. Assume that there are precisely 2023 ordered pairs (x,y) in S\times S so that the product xy is a perfect square. Prove that one can find at least four distinct elements in S so that none of their pairwise products is a perfect square.

I will use Atul's sol, cause it's the exact same as mine. 

Proof: Consider the graph G induced by the elements of S and edges being if the products are perfect squares. Note that if xy = a^2 and xz = b^2, then yz = \left( \frac{ab}{x} \right)^2, since its an integer and square of a rational number its a perfect square and so yz is an edge too. So the graph is a bunch of disjoint cliques, say with sizes c_1, c_2, \cdots, c_k. Then \sum_{i=1}^k c_i^2 = 2023, which implies k \geqslant 4 since 2023 \equiv 7 \pmod 8. Now pick one element from each of these cliques and it works.

I am starting with Harmonic DGX: 

A few stuffs to note for me.





2016 G2

Let ABC be a triangle with circumcircle \Gamma and incenter I and let M be the midpoint of \overline{BC}. The points D, E, F are selected on sides \overline{BC}, \overline{CA}, \overline{AB} such that \overline{ID} \perp \overline{BC}, \overline{IE}\perp \overline{AI}, and \overline{IF}\perp \overline{AI}. Suppose that the circumcircle of \triangle AEF intersects \Gamma at a point X other than A. Prove that lines XD and AM meet on \Gamma.

Proof: Define T as the mixtillinear in touch point. Define S, P as the midpoint of major arc, minor arc BC

Claim: BFIT, CEIT harmonic

Proof: Introduce the midpoint of arc AB, BC ( say M_c,M_b) and angle chase. We have M_cB,M_cI tangent to BFIT. And we have T-F-M_c.

Define H=ST\cap BC.

Claim: AH,CF,BE concur

Proof: By ceva, we just have to show \frac{BF}{CE}=\frac{BH}{CH}.

For which, we use the fact that BFIT, CEIT are harmonic.

Claim: SX,EF,BC,TP concur

Proof: Note that (Z,H;B,C)=-1 where Z=EF\cap BC. Moreover, we know that \angle BTH=HTC

and \angle HTP=90\implies Z-T-P.

As SH\perp ZP, ZH\perp PS\implies X-H-P.

Since (S,P;B,C)=-1, we get (X,T;B,C)=-1

Now define A' as the intersection of the parallel line through A to BC and (ABC)

Claim: T-D-A'

Proof: We have it because \angle BTA=CTD

and BA=CA'

Note that (AM\cap (ABC),A';B,C)=-1 ( just reflect over perpendicular bisector of BC) . But we have (X,T;B,C)=(XD\cap (ABC),A';B,C)=-1. So XD\cap (ABC)=AM\cap (ABC).

This was a pretty nice problem (sort of config based).. but I would recommend to go through it in future, cause pretty nice config geo!

USA EGMO TST 2023 P1

Let ABC be a triangle with AB+AC=3BC. The B-excircle touches side AC and line BC at E and D, respectively. The C-excircle touches side AB at F. Let lines CF and DE meet at P. Prove that \angle PBC = 90^{\circ}

Proof: If BC=a. Note that CE=CD=\frac{AB+BC+CA}{2}-C=a. So C is the centre of (BDE) and hence \angle BDE=90. So C is midpoint of BE

Define I as the incentre of ABC. Let the incircle touch CA at M, BC at L. Let M antipode be N and L antipode be J

Claim:B-N-J-D collinear ( By symmetry we also get C-J-F)

Proof: By homothety, B-N-D. Note that if \angle BCA=2\theta, we get \angle BED=\theta\implies CI||EA.

We have \angle EBD=90-\theta and \angle ILM =\theta\implies \Delta LMJ \text{ is similar to } \Delta EDB

Note that \angle MJN=90. Since JL\perp BC\implies \angle LJB=90-\angle LBJ=\theta. And \angle LJN=\angle JLM=\theta\implies J-N-B.

Define P' as the intersection of the perpendicular at B to BC and CE.  Define C'=CI\cap BC. Since LJ||BP' and I is midpoint of NJ\implies C' is midpoint of BP'

Now define Y as midpoint of NJ. Note that C-I-Y-C' ( as CI is perpendicular bisector of LM and LMNJ rectangle).

Note that \Delta BCY is similar to \Delta BED. So E-D-P'. So P'=P. And we are done! 

USAJMO 2011 P5

Points A,B,C,D,E lie on a circle \omega and point P lies outside the circle.
The given points are such that
(i) lines PB and PD are tangent to \omega,
(ii) P, A, C are collinear,
and (iii) {DE} \parallel {AC}.
Prove that {BE} bisects {AC}.

Proof: Note that (A,C;B,D)=-1\text { projecting through } E \text { on } AC\implies (A,C; BE\cap AC, P_{\infty})=-1.
Hence  BE\cap AC is the midpoint of AC. Hence BE bisects AC.


APMO 2013


Let ABCD be a quadrilateral inscribed in a circle \omega, and let P be a point on the extension of {AC} such that {PB} and {PD} are tangent to \omega. The tangent at C intersects {PD} at Q and the line AD at R. Let E be the second point of intersection between {AQ} and \omega. Prove that B, E, R are collinear.

Proof: Note that -1=(A,E;C,D)=(A,RE\cap \omega; C,D)
But we know (A,C;B,D)=-1\implies RE\cap \omega=B.

China TST 2002

Let ABCD be a quadrilateral. Point E is the intersection of lines AB and CD
while point F is the intersection of lines BC and DA. The diagonals of the quadrilateral meet at P, and point O is the foot from P to \overline{EF}.
Prove that \angle BOC = \angle AOD.

Proof: Let DB\cap FE=X, FP\cap DC=Y. Note that -1=(D,C;Y,E)=(D,B;P,Y)\implies PO\text{ bisects } \angle DOB.
Similarly we get PO \text{ bisects } \angle AOC. Hence  \angle BOC = \angle AOD.


ELMO Shortlist 2019 G1

Let ABC be an acute triangle with orthocenter H and circumcircle \Gamma.
Let BH intersect AC at E, and let CH intersect AB at F. Let AH intersect \Gamma again at P \neq A. Let PE intersect \Gamma again at Q \neq P.
Prove that BQ bisects segment \overline{EF}.

Proof: Let the parallel line through B to EF intersect (ABC) at X. Let EF\cap BC=T, TA\cap (ABC)=R. Then note that (AREF), R-E-X. 
So -1=(B,C;T,D)\text{ projecting through } A \text { on } (ABC)
\implies -1= (BC; RP)\text{ projecting through } A \text { on } (ABC)\text{ projecting through } E \text { on } (ABC)
\implies (BE\cap (ABC)A;XQ)=-1\text{ projecting through } E \text { on } (ABC)\implies  (EF;\infty_{EF}BQ\cap EF)=-1.




We have FM\cdot FX=MA\cdot MD=MY\cdot MF\implies EYXF\text{ is cyclic}.

The following problem was done with Atul and Archit :D

SAGF part 1 P2


In an acute-angled triangle, ABC w is a circumscribed circle, and O is inside the triangle and OB = OC. The point D is selected on the side of AB,so that OD \parallel BC. The straight line AO repeatedly intersects the circles w and (COD) at the points A',P, respectively. M is the middle of the side of BC. Circle (MAA') intersects the line BC at the point L. The straight line AL repeatedly intersects the circle w at the point K. Prove that \angle APK = \angle AA'M

Proof: We start with the following lemma.
Lemma:Let ABC be a triangle, O be a point on the perpendicular bisector of BC. Let D,E denote the intersection of line parallel AB,AC. Define P=(DOC)\cap (EOP). Then points A,O and P are collinear.

Proof: Invert about O. The inverted problem is: Give ABC triangle with O be a point on the perpendicular bisector of BC. Let D,E denote the intersection of line parallel (AOB),(AOC). We have to show that AO, CD,BE concur.

Note that as OB=OC we have\angle DAB=\angle DOB=\angle EOC=\angle EAC.
Define \ell_1 as the reflection of DB over the angle bisector of \angle B and \ell_2 as the reflection of CE over the angle bisector of \angle C. We claim that \ell_1 \parallel \ell_2 \parallel OP

To see this,\angle AOD=\theta=\angle ABD\implies \angle AOE=180-\theta=\angle ACE.
Let X be on \ell_1 such that D and X are on opposite sides of AB. Similarly, define Y be on \ell_2 such that E and Y are on opposite sides of AC. So note that\angle CBX=\theta,\angle BCY=180-\theta\implies \ell_1 \parallel \ell_2.
Note that \angle ABX=\angle B+\theta. And180-\angle OAB-180-\angle ODB=\angle DBC=\angle B+\theta\implies OA||l_1||l_2.
So BX\cap CY=P_{\infty}, A-O-P_{\infty}\text{ collinear}. By Jacobi theorem, we get A-O-P_{\infty},CD,BE concur. Hence, we get A-O-P collinear.

Redefine the problem in the following way: Define trinagle ABC, O be a point on the perpendicular bisector of BC. Let D,F denote the intersection of line parallel AB,AC. Define P=(DOC)\cap (EOP). Define M as the midpoint of BC. Define I=AB\cap (DOCP), H=AC\cap (BOFP). Define L'= BC\cap IH. Define E=AO\cap BC, A'=AO\cap (ABC). We will shwo that L',A',M,A cyclic i.e L'=L. Note that (L',E;B,C)=-1. And hence we haveME\cdot EL'=EC\cdot EB=AE\cdot EA'\implies L'MAA'\text{ is cyclic}\implies L'=L.
Due to this, we get that K is the miquel point of BCHI(as K=(ABC)\cap AL). Since K is the miquel point, we have (ABCK),(AIHK),(KCHL) cyclic. We actually don't need all the cyclicities, but we'll prove them because why not.

Note that (B,C;E,L)=-1\implies LB\cdot LC=LM\cdot LE. But LB\cdot LC=LA\cdot LK\implies AKEM is cyclic.

P\in (AKHI) as\angle IPH=\angle IPO+\angle OPH=\angle ADO+\angle AFO=180-\angle A\implies P\in(AKI).
Define G=DF\cap AL, then KFGH cyclic, this is because\angle KGF=\angle KLC=\angle KLB=\angle KIB=\angle KHC.
The last equality follows as K is the spiral center taking BI to CH.

So by PoP, we getAK\cdot AG=AF\cdot AH=AO\cdot AP=AD\cdot AI
which gives KDIG,KGOP cyclic.

EKLP cyclic as\angle KLE=\angle KLB=\angle KIB=\angle KIA=\angle KPA=\angle KPE.
AKME cyclic asLM\cdot LE=LB\cdot LC=LA\cdot LK\implies AKME\text{ is cyclic}.
Now to finish proving \angle APK=\angle AA'M, note that\angle APK=\angle AIK=\angle BIK=\angle BLK=\angle MLA=\angle AA'M
so we're done.

GOTEEM 2020


Let ABC be a scalene triangle. The incircle of \triangle ABC is tangent to sides {BC}, {CA}, {AB} at D, E, F, respectively. Let G be a point on the incircle of \triangle ABC such that \angle AGD = 90^\circ. If lines DG and EF intersect at P,prove that AP is parallel to BC.

Proof: Let D' be the antipode of D wrt incircle. Note that (D',G;E,F)=-1\text { projecting through } D \text { on } EF\implies (DD'\cap EF, P;E,F)=-1.
Let M be the midpoint of BC. Define X=EF\cap BC. We have EF,DD',AM concur at say R.  Projecting through R on BC-1=(R,P;E,F)=(M,PA\cap BC;B,C)\implies PA||BC.


AHH I have more to post but I will post in different blogpost! Bie people!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My experiences at EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience

Yes, I know. This post should have been posted like 2 months ago. Okay okay, sorry. But yeah, I was just waiting for everything to be over and I was lazy. ( sorry ) You know, the transitioning period from high school to college is very weird. I will join CMI( Chennai Mathematical  Institue) for bsc maths and cs degree. And I am very scared. Like very very scared. No, not about making new friends and all. I don't care about that part because I know a decent amount of CMI people already.  What I am scared of is whether I will be able to handle the coursework and get good grades T_T Anyways, here's my EGMO PDC, EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience. Yes, a lot of stuff. My EGMO experience is a lot and I wrote a lot of details, IMOTC and PROMYS is just a few paras. Oh to those, who don't know me or are reading for the first time. I am Sunaina Pati. I was IND2 at EGMO 2023 which was held in Slovenia. I was also invited to the IMOTC or International Mathematical Olympiad Training Cam...

Geometry ( Finally!!!)

 This is just such an unfair blog.  Like if one goes through this blog, one can notice how dominated  Algebra is!! Like 6 out of 9 blog post is Algebra dominated -_- Where as I am not a fan of Algebra, compared to other genres of Olympiad Math(as of now). And this was just injustice for Synthetic Geo. So this time , go geo!!!!!!!!!!!  These problems are randomly from A Beautiful Journey through Olympiad Geometry.  Also perhaps I will post geo after March, because I am studying combi.  Problem:  Let ABC be an acute triangle where \angle BAC = 60^{\circ}. Prove that if the Euler’s line of \triangle ABC intersects AB and AC at D and E, respectively, then \triangle ADE is equilateral. Solution:  Since \angle A=60^{\circ} , we get AH=2R\cos A=R=AO. So \angle EHA=\angle DOA. Also it's well known that H and O isogonal conjugates.\angle OAD =\angle EAH. By ASA congruence, we get AE=AD. Hence \triangle ADE is equilateral....

Introduction

  Hey Everyone!! This is my first Blog post. So let me give a brief introduction about myself. I am Sunaina Pati. I love solving Olympiad math problems,  learning crazy astronomical facts , playing hanabi and anti-chess, listening to Kpop , love making diagrams in Geogebra and  teaching other people maths 😊 . I love geometry , number theory and Combinatorics . I am starting this blog to keep myself a bit motivated in doing studies 😎 . Right now, I am planning to write walkthroughs on some of the best problems I tried over the week which can refer for hints 'cause solutions contain some major spoilers and one learns a lot while solving the problem on his own rather than seeing solutions . Also, there will be some reviews about Kpop songs, study techniques, my day to day lifestyles,exam reviews and ofc some non-sense surprises 😂.  I am planning to  try  posting every week on Sundays or Saturdays ( most probably) ! Though there is no guarantee about when I ...

Some problems in Olympiad Graph theory!

Hello there! It has been a long time since I uploaded a post here. I recently took a class at the European Girls' Mathematical Olympiad Training Camp 2024, held at CMI. Here are a few problems that I discussed! My main references were Po-Shen Loh's Graph theory Problem set (2008), Adrian tang's Graph theory problem set (2012) and Warut Suksompong's Graph Cycles and Olympiad Problems Handout and AoPS. I also referred to Evan Chen's Graph theory Otis Problem set for nice problems! Text Book Problems which are decent A connected graph G is said to be k-vertex-connected (or k-connected) if it has more than k vertices and remains connected whenever fewer than k vertices are removed. Show that every k-connected graph of order atleast 2k contains a cycle of length at least 2k. We begin with a lemma. Prove that a graph G of order n \geq 2k is k connected then every 2 disjoint set V_1 and V_2 of k distinct vertices each, there exist k...

Problems I did this week [Jan8-Jan14]

Yeyy!! I am being so consistent with my posts~~ Here are a few problems I did the past week and yeah INMO going to happen soon :) All the best to everyone who is writing!  I wont be trying any new problems and will simply revise stuffs :) Some problems here are hard. Try them yourself and yeah~~Solutions (with sources) are given at the end! Problems discussed in the blog post Problem1: Let ABC be a triangle whose incircle \omega touches sides BC, CA, AB at D,E,F respectively. Let H be the orthocenter of DEF and let altitude DH intersect \omega again at P and EF intersect BC at L. Let the circumcircle of BPC intersect \omega again at X. Prove that points L,D,H,X are concyclic. Problem 2: Let ABCD be a convex quadrangle, P the intersection of lines AB and CD, Q the intersection of lines AD and BC and O the intersection of diagonals AC and BD. Show that if \angle POQ= 90^\circ then PO is the bisector of \angle AOD ...

Orders and Primitive roots

 Theory  We know what Fermat's little theorem states. If p is a prime number, then for any integer a, the number a^p − a is an integer multiple of p. In the notation of modular arithmetic, this is expressed as a^{p}\equiv a{\pmod {p}}.
So, essentially, for every (a,m)=1, {a}^{\phi (m)}\equiv 1 \pmod {m}. But \phi (m) isn't necessarily the smallest exponent. For example, we know 4^{12}\equiv 1\mod 13 but so is 4^6. So, we care about the "smallest" exponent d such that a^d\equiv 1\mod m given (a,m)=1.  Orders Given a prime p, the order of an integer a modulo p, p\nmid a, is the smallest positive integer d, such that a^d \equiv 1 \pmod p. This is denoted \text{ord}_p(a) = d. If p is a primes and p\nmid a, let d be order of a mod p. Then a^n\equiv 1\pmod p\implies d|n. Let n=pd+r, r\ll d. Which implies a^r\equiv 1\pmod p. But d is the smallest natural number. So r=0. So d|n. Show that n divid...

Solving Random ISLs And Sharygin Solutions! And INMO happened!!

Some of the ISLs I did before INMO :P  [2005 G3]:  Let ABCD be a parallelogram. A variable line g through the vertex A intersects the rays BC and DC at the points X and Y, respectively. Let K and L be the A-excenters of the triangles ABX and ADY. Show that the angle \measuredangle KCL is independent of the line g Solution: Note that \Delta LDK \sim \Delta XBK
and \Delta ADY\sim \Delta XCY.
So we have \frac{BK}{DY}=\frac{XK}{LY}
and \frac{DY}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}=\frac{AY}{XY}.
Hence \frac{BK}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}\implies \frac{BK}{BC}=\frac{CY}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}=\frac{AB}{BC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}
\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{XK}{BK}=\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{LY}{DY}=\frac{AB}{DL}
\implies \Delta CBK\sim \Delta LDK
And we are done. We get that \angle KCL=360-(\angle ACB+\angle DKC+\angle BCK)=\angle DAB/2 +180-\angle DAB=180-\angle DAB/2
Motivation: I took a hint on this. I had other angles but I did...

Let's complex bash Part 1

I have to learn complex bash. And almost everyone knows that I am notes taking girl so thought why not make a post on complex bash ( so that I don't get emotionally demotivated lol).😇 There wasn't any need for learning complex bash, but it was in my dream checklist i.e " To learn a bash." And since I am not loaded with exams, I think it's high time to learn Bash and new topics.  Also if anyone from the "anti-bash" community is reading, sorry in advance and R.I.P.  Notes:- 1. Complex numbers are of the form z=a+ib, where a and b are real numbers and i^2=-1. 2. In polar form, z=r(\cos \theta+~~i\sin\theta)=~~re^{i\theta}, where r=~~|z|=~~\sqrt{a^2+b^2}, which is called the magnitude. 3. Here we used euler's formula i.e \cos \theta+~~i\sin\theta=~~e^{i\theta}. 4. The \theta is called the argument of z, denored \arg z. ( \theta can be considered in \mod 360 and it is  measured anti-clockwise). 5. The complex conjugate of z is ...

IMO 2023 P2

IMO 2023 P2 Well, IMO 2023 Day 1 problems are out and I thought of trying the geometry problem which was P2.  Problem: Let ABC be an acute-angled triangle with AB < AC. Let \Omega be the circumcircle of ABC. Let S be the midpoint of the arc CB of \Omega containing A. The perpendicular from A to BC meets BS at D and meets \Omega again at E \neq A. The line through D parallel to BC meets line BE at L. Denote the circumcircle of triangle BDL by \omega. Let \omega meet \Omega again at P \neq B. Prove that the line tangent to \omega at P meets line BS on the internal angle bisector of \angle BAC. Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end! Proof Define A' as the antipode of A. And redefine P=A'D\cap (ABC). Define L=SP\cap (PDB).  Claim1: L-B-E collinear Proof: Note that \angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.
So $$\angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \ang...

How to prepare for INMO

Since INMO is coming up, it would be nice to write a post about it! A lot of people have been asking me for tips. To people who are visiting this site for the first time, hi! I am Sunaina Pati, an undergrad student at Chennai Mathematical Institute. I was an INMO awardee in 2021,2022,2023. I am also very grateful to be part of the India EGMO 2023 delegation. Thanks to them I got a silver medal!  I think the title of the post might be clickbait for some. What I want to convey is how I would have prepared for INMO if I were to give it again. Anyway, so here are a few tips for people! Practice, practice, practice!! I can not emphasize how important this is. This is the only way you can realise which areas ( that is combinatorics, geometry, number theory, algebra) are your strength and where you need to work on. Try the problems as much as you want, and make sure you use all the ideas you can possibly think of before looking at a hint. So rather than fixing time as a measure to dec...