Skip to main content

Weird Theorems

Welcome back to this blog.

 Oki it's a new day and I decided to prove some weird theorems/lemmas with weird names. So, you can try proving it too! 

In my list we have, 

  • Sawayama theorem
  • Butterfly Theorem
  • Iran lemma
  • Simon's Trick
  • Chicken McNugget Theorem
  • Pick's theorem
  • Fermat's Christmas Theorem
Sawayama Thebault Theorem: Let $ABC$ be a triangle with circumcircle $\Gamma$ and incenter I. Let $D \in BC.$ Let $\Omega_1$ be the circle tangent to the line segments $DA$ and $DB$ and to the circle $\Gamma$, and let $\Omega_2$ be the circle tangent to the line segments $DA$ and $DC$ and to the circle $\Gamma$. If $O_1$ and $O_2$ are the centres of  $\Omega_1$ and $\Omega_2$, respectively, prove that $O_1 -I -O_2$ are collinear.

Walkthrough: 

  • Note $I\in EF,~~I\in GH$
  • Prove $O_1DO_2=90$
  • $DO_1|| GH$ and $DO_2 || EF.$
  • Since we want to prove that $I \in O_1 O_2 $, let $EF \cap O_1 O_2 = I '$ and let $GH \cap O_1 O_2 = I".$ 
  • $$\frac {O_1I'}{I'O_2}=\frac{O_1X}{DX}, \frac {O_1I''}{O_2I"}=\frac{DY}{O_2Y}$$
  • Note that $$\frac{O_1X}{DX}=\frac{DY}{O_2Y}$$

Butterfly's theorem: Let $M$ be the midpoint of a chord $PQ$ of a circle $\omega,$ through which two other chords $AB$ and $CD$ are drawn. Let $AD \cap PQ = X$ and $BC \cap PQ = Y.$ Prove that $M $ is also the midpoint of $XY.$

Walkthrough: Introduce the midpoint and then drop perps.
Introduce the midpoints of $AD$ and $CB.$
  • Note that $$\frac{AD}{AM}=\frac{CB}{CM}$$
  • So $$\frac{AR}{AM}=\frac{CS}{CM}$$
  • So we have $AMR$ similar to $CMS.$
  • So by cycilcity stuff $\angle MOX=\angle MOY.$
Incenter perpendicularity: The incircle of $\Delta ABC$ is tangent to $BC, CA, AB$ at $D, E, F$ respectively. Let $M_{BC}$ and $M_{AC}$ be the midpoints of $BC$ and $AC.$ If $K$ is the intersection of lines $BI$ and $EF, $ then $BK \perp KC.$ In addition, $K$ lies on line $MN.$




Walkthrough: 
  • Define $K$ as a point on $BI$ such that $BI\cap CK.$ So $I, D, E,K, C$ is cyclic. Now, note that $M_{BC}$ is the centre of the right angle triangle $BKC.$ So $$\angle KM_{BC}C=2\angle IBC=\angle B\implies M_{BC}-M_{AC}-K$$
  • Note that $$\angle EKI=\angle ECI=C/2=\angle (FE,BI)\implies F-E-K$$
Simon's trick: It's pretty famous and the origin of the name is discussed here. Also, Simon is Akshay Venkatesh's student :O

$$ mn+m+n+1= (m+1)(n+1)$$

Yeah, that's it.

The Chicken McNugget Theorem: For any two relatively prime positive integers $m,n$, the greatest integer that cannot be written in the form $am + bn$ for nonnegative integers $a, b$ is $mn-m-n$.

Moreover, exactly $\frac{(m - 1)(n - 1)}{2}$ positive integers which cannot be expressed in the form $am + bn$.

Walkthrough: 

I think the picture is enough :P




Pick's theorem: The area of a lattice  polygon is

$$A = I + \frac{1}{2}B - 1$$

where $I$ is the number of lattice points in the interior and $B$ is the number of lattice points on the boundary.

Proof: Define nice triangles as triangles with no interior points. Clearly nice triangles satisfy the theorem.


 Now, for any arbitrary triangle, we kinda use induction. And consider a point inside the arbitrary triangle ( there exist, else the triangle is a nice triangle). And then find the area of new triangles ( where we can again divide and so on, till we get nice triangles).



Now $$[ABC]=[AOC]+[BOC]+[AOB]$$ 
$$ [AOB]=I_1+\frac{B_1+B_2+B_4}{2}$$
$$ [AOC]=I_2+\frac{B_1+B_3+B_5}{2}$$
$$ [OBC]=I_3+\frac{B_3+B_2+B_6}{2}$$

Now, the boundary points $B_1,B_2,B_3$ are actually the interior point of $ABC.$
So $$[AOC]+[BOC]+[AOB]= I_1+\frac{B_1+B_2+B_4}{2}+I_2+\frac{B_1+B_3+B_5}{2} +I_3+\frac{B_3+B_2+B_6}{2}$$ 
$$= [I_1+I_2+I_3+ B_1+B_2+B_3]+\frac{B_4+B_5+B_6}{2}$$

And then we can divide the polygon into triangles and proceed the same.

Fermat's Christmas Theorem: An odd prime can be written as the sum of two squares iff the prime is $1 \pmod 4.$


Direction1: If the odd prime is $3\pmod 4$ then it can not be written as a sum of two squares.

Proof: Consider $\mod 4,$ an odd square is always $0,1,\mod 4.$

The other direction uses Gaussian integers and more fancy stuff..so I will probably dedicate a whole blogpost on it :P

Moreover, we also have, 

Corollary: If $p$ is an odd prime $p\equiv 3  $ mod $4$ and $p|(x^2+y^2)$ then prove that $p|x$ and $p|y$

Proof: Let $p=4k+3,$ and $p\not\mid x, p\not\mid y,$
$$x^2\equiv -y^2\mod p $$
$$(x^2)^{2k+1}\equiv (-y^2)^{2k+1}\mod p $$
$$(x^2)^{p-1}\equiv -(y^2)^{p-1}\mod p $$
By FLT, we get a contradiction. 


So yeee! That's it for today's blog post! I think the names are very funny :P and proving them was equally fun! Summary of 2021 blog post coming soon :P

See ya soon! ( thanks to Anand, now I too say "ya" instead of "you")
Sunaina💜

Comments

  1. I am.the same commenter from the previous blog post!

    Also Fermats last theorem,Zsigmondy's theorem belong to this category.

    And the most weird one is pascal's theorem other than anything else 😡

    ReplyDelete
  2. this blog is kinda cute

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My experiences at EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience

Yes, I know. This post should have been posted like 2 months ago. Okay okay, sorry. But yeah, I was just waiting for everything to be over and I was lazy. ( sorry ) You know, the transitioning period from high school to college is very weird. I will join CMI( Chennai Mathematical  Institue) for bsc maths and cs degree. And I am very scared. Like very very scared. No, not about making new friends and all. I don't care about that part because I know a decent amount of CMI people already.  What I am scared of is whether I will be able to handle the coursework and get good grades T_T Anyways, here's my EGMO PDC, EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience. Yes, a lot of stuff. My EGMO experience is a lot and I wrote a lot of details, IMOTC and PROMYS is just a few paras. Oh to those, who don't know me or are reading for the first time. I am Sunaina Pati. I was IND2 at EGMO 2023 which was held in Slovenia. I was also invited to the IMOTC or International Mathematical Olympiad Training Cam...

Orders and Primitive roots

 Theory  We know what Fermat's little theorem states. If $p$ is a prime number, then for any integer $a$, the number $a^p − a$ is an integer multiple of $p$. In the notation of modular arithmetic, this is expressed as \[a^{p}\equiv a{\pmod {p}}.\] So, essentially, for every $(a,m)=1$, ${a}^{\phi (m)}\equiv 1 \pmod {m}$. But $\phi (m)$ isn't necessarily the smallest exponent. For example, we know $4^{12}\equiv 1\mod 13$ but so is $4^6$. So, we care about the "smallest" exponent $d$ such that $a^d\equiv 1\mod m$ given $(a,m)=1$.  Orders Given a prime $p$, the order of an integer $a$ modulo $p$, $p\nmid a$, is the smallest positive integer $d$, such that $a^d \equiv 1 \pmod p$. This is denoted $\text{ord}_p(a) = d$. If $p$ is a primes and $p\nmid a$, let $d$ be order of $a$ mod $p$. Then $a^n\equiv 1\pmod p\implies d|n$. Let $n=pd+r, r\ll d$. Which implies $a^r\equiv 1\pmod p.$ But $d$ is the smallest natural number. So $r=0$. So $d|n$. Show that $n$ divid...

IMO Shortlist 2022 C1

  Today we shall try IMO Shortlist $2022$ C1. A $\pm 1$-sequence is a sequence of $2022$ numbers $a_1, \ldots, a_{2022},$ each equal to either $+1$ or $-1$. Determine the largest $C$ so that, for any $\pm 1$-sequence, there exists an integer $k$ and indices $1 \le t_1 < \ldots < t_k \le 2022$ so that $t_{i+1} - t_i \le 2$ for all $i$, and$$\left| \sum_{i = 1}^{k} a_{t_i} \right| \ge C.$$ We claim that the answer is $\boxed{506}$. $506$ is the upper bound. Just consider the sequence $$+1,-1,-1,+1,+1,-1,-1,+1\dots,-1,-1,+1,+1,-1.$$ Here $1, -1, -1, 1$ is repeated $505$ times and $1,-1$ is concatted to it. Now,our sequence would be $a_1,a_3,a_4,a_5,a_7,\dots$ which on summing would give $506$. And clearly, this would give the upper bound. Now, we show that $506$ is attainable by every sequence. WLOG there are at least $1011$ positive numbers in the sequence. Then we choose $+1$ whenever we can. Let the sequence be $c_1,b_1,\dots, c_n,b_n$ where $c_i$ are ...

IMO Shortlist 2021 C1

 I am planning to do at least one ISL every day so that I do not lose my Olympiad touch (and also they are fun to think about!). Today, I tried the 2021 IMO shortlist C1.  (2021 ISL C1) Let $S$ be an infinite set of positive integers, such that there exist four pairwise distinct $a,b,c,d \in S$ with $\gcd(a,b) \neq \gcd(c,d)$. Prove that there exist three pairwise distinct $x,y,z \in S$ such that $\gcd(x,y)=\gcd(y,z) \neq \gcd(z,x)$. Suppose not. Then any $3$ elements $x,y,z\in S$ will be $(x,y)=(y,z)=(x,z)$ or $(x,y)\ne (y,z)\ne (x,z)$. There exists an infinite set $T$ such that $\forall x,y\in T,(x,y)=d,$ where $d$ is constant. Fix a random element $a$. Note that $(x,a)|a$. So $(x,a)\le a$.Since there are infinite elements and finite many possibilities for the gcd (atmost $a$). So $\exists$ set $T$ which is infinite such that $\forall b_1,b_2\in T$ $$(a,b_1)=(a,b_2)=d.$$ Note that if $(b_1,b_2)\ne d$ then we get a contradiction as we get a set satisfying the proble...

Geometry ( Finally!!!)

 This is just such an unfair blog.  Like if one goes through this blog, one can notice how dominated  Algebra is!! Like 6 out of 9 blog post is Algebra dominated -_- Where as I am not a fan of Algebra, compared to other genres of Olympiad Math(as of now). And this was just injustice for Synthetic Geo. So this time , go geo!!!!!!!!!!!  These problems are randomly from A Beautiful Journey through Olympiad Geometry.  Also perhaps I will post geo after March, because I am studying combi.  Problem:  Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle where $\angle BAC = 60^{\circ}$. Prove that if the Euler’s line of $\triangle ABC$ intersects $AB$ and $AC$ at $D$ and $E$, respectively, then $\triangle ADE$ is equilateral. Solution:  Since $\angle A=60^{\circ}$ , we get $AH=2R\cos A=R=AO$. So $\angle EHA=\angle DOA.$ Also it's well known that $H$ and $O $ isogonal conjugates.$\angle OAD =\angle EAH.$ By $ASA$ congruence, we get $AE=AD.$ Hence $\triangle ADE$ is equilateral....

Symmetric Polynomials #week 6

Well... I haven't seen much symmetric polynomials in Olympiads, but still I am learning, because I found them cute. And I am basically using this blog as my notes :P What are symmetric polynomials?  One can understand this with  examples. If we are considering over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then  $$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3=x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3+x_1^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_3+x_2^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_1+x_3^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_2.$$ See? $3!$ terms! Let's take one more example with again over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then $$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^2= x_1^2\cdot x_2^2+x_1^2\cdot x_3^2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^2+x_2^2\cdot x_3^2+x_3^2\cdot x_1^2+x_3^2\cdot x_2^2$$ Wait.. why 2 times ? So basically what happens in symmetrictric sums, is we go through all $n!$ possible permutations. So, here we have $a^2\cdot b^2\cdot c^0$ as like the "general" form type, right? Now, list down all the $3!=6$ permutations of $x_1,x_2,x_3$, and put them in the gene...

Number Theory Revise part 1

I thought to revise David Burton and try out some problems which I didn't do. It's been almost 2 years since I touched that book so let's see! Also, this set of problems/notes is quite weird since it's actually a memory lane. You will get to know on your own! I started with proving a problem, remembered another problem and then another and so on! It was quite fun cause all these questions were the ones I really wanted to solve! And this is part1 or else the post would be too long. Problem1: Prove that for $n\ge 1$  $$\binom{n}{r}<\binom{n}{r+1}$$ iff $0\le r\le \frac{n-1}{2}$ Proof: We show that $\binom{n}{r}<\binom{n}{r+1}$ for $0\le r\le \frac{n-1}{2}$ and use the fact that $$\binom{n}{n-r}=\binom{n}{r}$$ Note that $\binom{n}{r}= \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}, \binom{n}{r+1}=\frac{n!}{(r+1)!(n-r-1)!}$  Comparing, it's enough to show that $$\frac{1}{n-r}<\frac{1}{r+1}\text{ or show } n-r>r+1$$ which is true as $0\le r\le \frac{n-1}{2}$ Problem2: Show that the exp...

IMO 2023 P2

IMO 2023 P2 Well, IMO 2023 Day 1 problems are out and I thought of trying the geometry problem which was P2.  Problem: Let $ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle with $AB < AC$. Let $\Omega$ be the circumcircle of $ABC$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of the arc $CB$ of $\Omega$ containing $A$. The perpendicular from $A$ to $BC$ meets $BS$ at $D$ and meets $\Omega$ again at $E \neq A$. The line through $D$ parallel to $BC$ meets line $BE$ at $L$. Denote the circumcircle of triangle $BDL$ by $\omega$. Let $\omega$ meet $\Omega$ again at $P \neq B$. Prove that the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$. Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end! Proof Define $A'$ as the antipode of $A$. And redefine $P=A'D\cap (ABC)$. Define $L=SP\cap (PDB)$.  Claim1: $L-B-E$ collinear Proof: Note that $$\angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.$$ So $$\angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \ang...

Reflecting on past

INMO Scores are out!! I am now a two times INMO awardee :) I got 16|0|1, so 17 in total! Yes, 16 in P1 T_T. I was thinking I would lose marks because of the way I wrote.  Lemme tell ya'll what happened that day but first I should share a few thoughts I had before the exam. My thoughts Honestly, my preparation for INMO was bad. In fact, I should say I didn't work hard at all. As I have said earlier, I had lost all my hopes for INMO and Olympiads as a whole after EGMO TSTs happened.  Art by Jelena Janic EGMO TSTs i.e European Girl's Mathematical Olympiad Team selection Tests 2022.  Literally my thoughts after EGMO TSTs I feel very ashamed to share but I got 1 mark in my EGMO TSTs. Tests in which I literally gave my whole life. I did so many ISLs ( like SO MANY), I mocked EGMO 2021 TST where my score was 28/42 and I perfected Day 2. 1 mark in the TST just showed my true potential. There are way better people than me in olys. A friend even said to me, "If I wouldn't...

INMO Scores and Results

Heya! INMO Results are out! Well, I am now a 3 times IMOTCer :D. Very excited to meet every one of you! My INMO score was exactly 26 with a distribution of 17|0|0|0|0|9, which was a fair grading cause after problem 1, I tried problem 6 next. I was hoping for some partials in problem 4 but didn't get any.  I am so so so excited to meet everyone! Can't believe my olympiad journey is going to end soon..  I thought to continue the improvement table I made last year! ( I would still have to add my EGMO performance and also IMO TST performance too) 2018-2019[ grade 8]:  Cleared PRMO, Cleared RMO[ State rank 4], Wrote INMO 2019-2020[ grade 9]:  Cleared PRMO, Cleared RMO[ State topper], Wrote INMO ( but flopped it) 2020-2021[grade 10]:  Cleared IOQM, Cleared INMO [ Through Girl's Quota] 2021-2022[grade 11]:  Wrote EGMO 2022 TST[ Rank 8], Qualified for IOQM part B directly, Cleared IOQM-B ( i.e INMO) [Through general quota],  2022-2023 [grade 12]:  Wrote E...