Skip to main content

Number Theory is my bias wrecker

Welcome Back to mah blog!

I thought I should revise Number theory and solve problems of IOQM level! 

Also, NT is definitely my bias wrecker ( Kpop term used to describe the second favourite which has huge chances to become your favourite!)

Problem 1 (2019 AMC 12A): For some positive integer $k$, the repeating base-$k$ representation of the (base-ten) fraction $\frac{7}{51}$ is $0.23_k = 0.232323\dots_k .$ What is $k$?

Solution: Note that $$ 0.232323\dots_k= \frac{ 2}{k}+\frac{3}{k^2}+\frac{2}{k^2}+\frac{3}{k^4}\dots$$

$$= \frac{2}{k}+\frac{2}{k^3}+\dots + \frac{3}{k^2}+\frac{3}{k^4}+\dots $$

$$ = \frac{2/k+3/k^2}{1-\frac{1}{k^2}}=\frac{7}{51}\implies k= 16.$$

Problem 2[ AIME 2008 II]: There exist $r$ unique nonnegative integers $n_1 > n_2 > \cdots > n_r$ and $r$ integers $a_k$ ($1\le k\le r$) with each $a_k$ either $1$ or $- 1$ such that $$a_13^{n_1} + a_23^{n_2} + \cdots + a_r3^{n_r} = 2008.$$ Find $n_1 + n_2 + \cdots + n_r$.

Solution: Note that $$\overline{2008}_{10} = \overline{2202101}_{3}.$$ And replacing $$2\cdot 3^k=3^{k+1}-3^k.$$ We get $$2008= 1+3^2-3^3+3^4-3^5+3^6-3^6+3^7=1+3^2-3^3+3^4-3^5+3^7$$

So, we get $\boxed{21}$ as the answer.


Problem 3: Determine the smallest positive integer $n$ which satisfies the congruence

$$n + n^{-1}\equiv 25 \pmod 143.$$

Solution: Note that, $$ \frac{1}{n}+n\equiv 25 \pmod 143 $$

$$ \implies n^2+1-25n\equiv 0\pmod 143$$

$$ \implies n^2+144-25n \equiv 0\pmod 143$$

$$\implies n^2-25n+144=(n-16)(n-9)\pmod 143$$

So $n\le 9,$ also $n<9$ doesn't work. So $n=\boxed{9}.$


Problem 4: Show that there are no integers $a, b, c$ for which $a^2 + b^2 - 8c = 6.$

Proof: Take $mod 8.$

 

Problem 5: Show that $a^{p(p-1)}\equiv 1 \mod p^2$

Proof: It's true by euler's theorem, so let's not use that.

We proceed the same way, we prove euler's theorem :P

$$a\cdot 2a \cdot  3a\dots, p-1\cdot a \cdot  p+1\cdot a \dots (p^2-1) \cdot a \equiv 1\cdot 2\cdot \dots (p^2-1)\mod p^2$$

$$\implies a^{p(p-1}\equiv 1\mod p^2$$ 


Another way is to use the fact that $$a^{p-1}\equiv 1\mod p\implies a^{p-1}\equiv 1, p+1, 2p+1,\dots p(p-1)+1\mod p^2$$ 

So $$a^{p(p-1)}\equiv 1^p, (p+1)^p,\dots , (p(p-1))^p \mod p^2$$

So $$a^{p(p-1)}\equiv 1\mod p^2$$


Problem 6 [ Math prize 2009]: When the integer $ {\left(\sqrt{3} + 5\right)}^{103} - {\left(\sqrt{3} - 5\right)}^{103}$ is divided by 9, what is the remainder?

Solution: Note that $$ {\left(\sqrt{3} + 5\right)}^{103} - {\left(\sqrt{3} - 5\right)}^{103}={\left(\sqrt{3} + 5\right)}^{103}+{\left(5-\sqrt{3} \right)}^{103}$$

$$=2\left( 5^{103}+\binom{103}{2}5^{101}\cdot 3+\dots +3^{51}\right)\equiv 2\left( 5^{103}+\binom{103}{2}5^{101}\cdot 3 \right)\equiv \boxed{1}\mod 9. $$


Problem 7[ 2016 CMIMC]: Determine the smallest positive prime $p$ which satisfies the congruence

$$p+ p^{-1}\equiv 25 \pmod 143.$$

Solution: We know that 

$$(p-9)(p-16)\equiv 0\mod 11\cdot 13$$ 

Then by CRT $$(p-9)(p-16)\equiv 0\mod 11\implies 9, 5\mod 11$$

$$(p-9)(p-16)\equiv 0\mod 13\implies 9,3 \mod 13$$

So the solutions are $$9, 16, 42, 126 \mod 143.$$ The smallest is $\boxed{269}.$


Problem 8: Find all primes $p$ such that $p$ divides $2^p + 1.$

Solution: Note that $2^p+1\equiv 3\mod p\implies p=3$


Problem 9[ Wilson theorem]: Prove that if $p$ is a prime then $(p - 1)! \equiv -1 \pmod p.$

Proof: It's pretty well known, but I will write for myself. We use the fact that only $1,p-1$ are self inverses of itself. Rest all the numbers have a unique and distinct inverse, forming pair whose product is $1\mod p.$ So

$$2\cdot 3\cdot 4\dots p-2\equiv 1\mod p\implies 1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 4\dots p-1\equiv p-1\mod p $$


Problem 10[ 1989 IMO P5]: Prove that for each positive integer $ n$ there exist $ n$ consecutive positive integers none of which is an integral power of a prime number.

Proof: We consider $k!+2, k!+3,\dots k!+n+1$ and take $k>>>>>n.$ Then

For any $2\le a\le n+1,$ $k!+a=a(k!/a+1)$ but $a|k!/a\implies $ two distinct prime factors divide $k!+a.$


Problem 11[Simpler CMIMC 2016]: Define a tasty residue of $n$ to be an integer

$1 \le a \le  n$ such that there exists an integer $m > 1$ satisfying $a^m \equiv a (mod n). Find

the number of tasty residues of prime $p.$

Solution: It's $\phi{p}+1$ as $$a^{m}-a\equiv 0\mod p\implies p|a , p|a^{m-1}-1$$ 


Problem 12[CMIMC 2016]: Define a tasty residue of $n$ to be an integer

$1 \le a \le  n$ such that there exists an integer $m > 1$ satisfying $a^m \equiv a (mod n). Find

the number of tasty residues of prime $2016.$

Solution: $2016= 2^5\cdot 3^2 \cdot 7$

We know that for any prime $p$ dividing $a^m-a$ we get $\phi{p}+1$ values of $a$ satisfying. 

By CRT, we get $(\phi{2^5}+1)(\phi{3^2}+1)(\phi{7}+1)=\boxed{833}$ values. 


Problem 13[ 2019 AIME P1]: Find the least odd prime factor of $2019^8 + 1.$

Solution: Since $$p|2019^8+1\implies p|2019^{16}-1\implies \phi{p}|16 \implies ord_p(2019)=16|\phi{p-1}$$

Clearly, $p=17$ doesn't work, and $p=97$ work.


Problem 14[USAMO]:Suppose that the set $\{1, 2, \dots  , 1998\}$ has been parti-

tioned into disjoint pairs $\{a_i , b_i \} (1 ≤\le i \le 999)$ so that for all $i$, $|a_i - b_i |$ equals $1$ or $6.$

Prove that the sum

$$|a_1 - b_1 | + |a_2 - b_2 | + \dots + |a_{999} − b_{999} |$$

ends in the digit $9$.

Proof: Note we just have to show that the answer is $-1 \pmod {10}$. We will show that

the answer is $1 \pmod 2  , 4  \pmod 5$ .

Note that $a_i - b_i$ and $a_i + b_i$ have the same parity.

So the sum is $1+2+\dots +1998 \pmod 2 \equiv  1 \pmod 2 .$

And $|a_i - b_i |$ is always $1  \pmod 5$  . Hence the sum is $1\cdot 999\equiv 4\pmod 5 $ .

By CRT we are done.


So yeee! Hope you have a nice day!

Sunaina 💜





Comments

  1. Thanks a lot for posting ioqm level problems!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice!
    Also try All Russian MO 2014 G9 P1,All Russsian MO 2015 G11P?(Forgot the problem number but pretty sure that the year is correct),2018 ARO G10 P4

    For more beautiful NT probs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hey! Thanks for commenting! I will try those! Actually I have an upcoming post, where I am going to share ARMO problems! So really thankyou!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My experiences at EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience

Yes, I know. This post should have been posted like 2 months ago. Okay okay, sorry. But yeah, I was just waiting for everything to be over and I was lazy. ( sorry ) You know, the transitioning period from high school to college is very weird. I will join CMI( Chennai Mathematical  Institue) for bsc maths and cs degree. And I am very scared. Like very very scared. No, not about making new friends and all. I don't care about that part because I know a decent amount of CMI people already.  What I am scared of is whether I will be able to handle the coursework and get good grades T_T Anyways, here's my EGMO PDC, EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience. Yes, a lot of stuff. My EGMO experience is a lot and I wrote a lot of details, IMOTC and PROMYS is just a few paras. Oh to those, who don't know me or are reading for the first time. I am Sunaina Pati. I was IND2 at EGMO 2023 which was held in Slovenia. I was also invited to the IMOTC or International Mathematical Olympiad Training Cam...

IMO Shortlist 2021 C1

 I am planning to do at least one ISL every day so that I do not lose my Olympiad touch (and also they are fun to think about!). Today, I tried the 2021 IMO shortlist C1.  (2021 ISL C1) Let $S$ be an infinite set of positive integers, such that there exist four pairwise distinct $a,b,c,d \in S$ with $\gcd(a,b) \neq \gcd(c,d)$. Prove that there exist three pairwise distinct $x,y,z \in S$ such that $\gcd(x,y)=\gcd(y,z) \neq \gcd(z,x)$. Suppose not. Then any $3$ elements $x,y,z\in S$ will be $(x,y)=(y,z)=(x,z)$ or $(x,y)\ne (y,z)\ne (x,z)$. There exists an infinite set $T$ such that $\forall x,y\in T,(x,y)=d,$ where $d$ is constant. Fix a random element $a$. Note that $(x,a)|a$. So $(x,a)\le a$.Since there are infinite elements and finite many possibilities for the gcd (atmost $a$). So $\exists$ set $T$ which is infinite such that $\forall b_1,b_2\in T$ $$(a,b_1)=(a,b_2)=d.$$ Note that if $(b_1,b_2)\ne d$ then we get a contradiction as we get a set satisfying the proble...

How to prepare for RMO?

"Let's wait for this exam to get over".. *Proceeds to wait for 2 whole fricking years!  I always wanted to write a book recommendation list, because I have been asked so many times! But then I was always like "Let's wait for this exam to get over" and so on. Why? You see it's pretty embarrassing to write a "How to prepare for RMO/INMO" post and then proceed to "fail" i.e not qualifying.  Okay okay, you might be thinking, "Sunaina you qualified like in 10th grade itself, you will obviously qualify in 11th and 12th grade." No. It's not that easy. Plus you are talking to a very underconfident girl. I have always underestimated myself. And I think that's the worst thing one can do itself. Am I confident about myself now? Definitely not but I am learning not to self-depreciate myself little by little. Okay, I shall write more about it in the next post describing my experience in 3 different camps and 1 program.  So, I got...

Solving Random ISLs And Sharygin Solutions! And INMO happened!!

Some of the ISLs I did before INMO :P  [2005 G3]:  Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. A variable line $g$ through the vertex $A$ intersects the rays $BC$ and $DC$ at the points $X$ and $Y$, respectively. Let $K$ and $L$ be the $A$-excenters of the triangles $ABX$ and $ADY$. Show that the angle $\measuredangle KCL$ is independent of the line $g$ Solution: Note that $$\Delta LDK \sim \Delta XBK$$ and $$\Delta ADY\sim \Delta XCY.$$ So we have $$\frac{BK}{DY}=\frac{XK}{LY}$$ and $$\frac{DY}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}=\frac{AY}{XY}.$$ Hence $$\frac{BK}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}\implies \frac{BK}{BC}=\frac{CY}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}=\frac{AB}{BC}\times \frac{XK}{LY} $$ $$\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{XK}{BK}=\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{LY}{DY}=\frac{AB}{DL}$$ $$\implies \Delta CBK\sim \Delta LDK$$ And we are done. We get that $$\angle KCL=360-(\angle ACB+\angle DKC+\angle BCK)=\angle DAB/2 +180-\angle DAB=180-\angle DAB/2$$ Motivation: I took a hint on this. I had other angles but I did...

New year with a new beginning! And a recap of 2024..and all the best for INMO 2025!

Hi everyone! Happy New Year :)  Thank you so much for 95k+ views!!! How was everyone's 2024? What are everyone's resolutions? ( Do write down in the comment section! And you can come back 1 year later to see if you made them possible!). A Better Mathematician  Well, technically a theoretical computer scientist.  I am so grateful to be allowed to study at CMI where I can interact with so many brilliant professors, access the beautiful library and obviously discuss mathematics ( sometimes non math too ) with the students.    And this year, I want to learn more mathematics and clear my fundamentals. I have become much worse in math actually. And hopefully, read some research papers too :)  And discuss a lot of mathematics with other people.  However, with that whole depressing 2024 year, I have lost a lot of my confidence in mathematics. And to be a better mathematician, I should gain the confidence that I can be a mathematician. And well, I am working on...

Some Geometry Problems for everyone to try!

 These problems are INMO~ish level. So trying this would be a good practice for INMO!  Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral. Let $M,N,P,Q$ be the midpoints of sides $AB,BC,CD,DA$. Prove that $MNPQ$ is a parallelogram. Consider $\Delta ABD$ and $\Delta BDC$ .Note that $NP||BD||MQ$. Similarly, $NM||AC||PQ$. Hence the parallelogram. In $\Delta ABC$, $\angle A$ be right. Let $D$ be the foot of the altitude from $A$ onto $BC$. Prove that $AD^2=BD\cdot CD$. Note that $\Delta ADB\sim \Delta CDA$. So by similarity, we have $$\frac{AD}{BD}=\frac{CD}{AD}.$$ In $\Delta ABC$, $\angle A$ be right. Let $D$ be the foot of the altitude from $A$ onto $BC$. Prove that $AD^2=BD\cdot CD$. Let $D\in CA$, such that $AD = AB$.Note that $BD||AS$. So by the Thales’ Proportionality Theorem, we are done! Given $\Delta ABC$, construct equilateral triangles $\Delta BCD,\Delta CAE,\Delta ABF$ outside of $\Delta ABC$. Prove that $AD=BE=CF$. This is just congruence. N...

Symmetric Polynomials #week 6

Well... I haven't seen much symmetric polynomials in Olympiads, but still I am learning, because I found them cute. And I am basically using this blog as my notes :P What are symmetric polynomials?  One can understand this with  examples. If we are considering over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then  $$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3=x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3+x_1^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_3+x_2^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_1+x_3^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_2.$$ See? $3!$ terms! Let's take one more example with again over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then $$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^2= x_1^2\cdot x_2^2+x_1^2\cdot x_3^2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^2+x_2^2\cdot x_3^2+x_3^2\cdot x_1^2+x_3^2\cdot x_2^2$$ Wait.. why 2 times ? So basically what happens in symmetrictric sums, is we go through all $n!$ possible permutations. So, here we have $a^2\cdot b^2\cdot c^0$ as like the "general" form type, right? Now, list down all the $3!=6$ permutations of $x_1,x_2,x_3$, and put them in the gene...

IMO Shortlist 2022 C1

  Today we shall try IMO Shortlist $2022$ C1. A $\pm 1$-sequence is a sequence of $2022$ numbers $a_1, \ldots, a_{2022},$ each equal to either $+1$ or $-1$. Determine the largest $C$ so that, for any $\pm 1$-sequence, there exists an integer $k$ and indices $1 \le t_1 < \ldots < t_k \le 2022$ so that $t_{i+1} - t_i \le 2$ for all $i$, and$$\left| \sum_{i = 1}^{k} a_{t_i} \right| \ge C.$$ We claim that the answer is $\boxed{506}$. $506$ is the upper bound. Just consider the sequence $$+1,-1,-1,+1,+1,-1,-1,+1\dots,-1,-1,+1,+1,-1.$$ Here $1, -1, -1, 1$ is repeated $505$ times and $1,-1$ is concatted to it. Now,our sequence would be $a_1,a_3,a_4,a_5,a_7,\dots$ which on summing would give $506$. And clearly, this would give the upper bound. Now, we show that $506$ is attainable by every sequence. WLOG there are at least $1011$ positive numbers in the sequence. Then we choose $+1$ whenever we can. Let the sequence be $c_1,b_1,\dots, c_n,b_n$ where $c_i$ are ...

IMO 2023 P2

IMO 2023 P2 Well, IMO 2023 Day 1 problems are out and I thought of trying the geometry problem which was P2.  Problem: Let $ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle with $AB < AC$. Let $\Omega$ be the circumcircle of $ABC$. Let $S$ be the midpoint of the arc $CB$ of $\Omega$ containing $A$. The perpendicular from $A$ to $BC$ meets $BS$ at $D$ and meets $\Omega$ again at $E \neq A$. The line through $D$ parallel to $BC$ meets line $BE$ at $L$. Denote the circumcircle of triangle $BDL$ by $\omega$. Let $\omega$ meet $\Omega$ again at $P \neq B$. Prove that the line tangent to $\omega$ at $P$ meets line $BS$ on the internal angle bisector of $\angle BAC$. Well, here's my proof, but I would rather call this my rough work tbh. There are comments in the end! Proof Define $A'$ as the antipode of $A$. And redefine $P=A'D\cap (ABC)$. Define $L=SP\cap (PDB)$.  Claim1: $L-B-E$ collinear Proof: Note that $$\angle SCA=\angle SCB-\angle ACB=90-A/2-C.$$ So $$\angle SPA=90-A/2-C\implies \ang...

Problems I did this week [Jan8-Jan14]

Yeyy!! I am being so consistent with my posts~~ Here are a few problems I did the past week and yeah INMO going to happen soon :) All the best to everyone who is writing!  I wont be trying any new problems and will simply revise stuffs :) Some problems here are hard. Try them yourself and yeah~~Solutions (with sources) are given at the end! Problems discussed in the blog post Problem1: Let $ABC$ be a triangle whose incircle $\omega$ touches sides $BC, CA, AB$ at $D,E,F$ respectively. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of $DEF$ and let altitude $DH$ intersect $\omega$ again at $P$ and $EF$ intersect $BC$ at $L$. Let the circumcircle of $BPC$ intersect $\omega$ again at $X$. Prove that points $L,D,H,X$ are concyclic. Problem 2: Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrangle, $ P$ the intersection of lines $ AB$ and $ CD$, $ Q$ the intersection of lines $ AD$ and $ BC$ and $ O$ the intersection of diagonals $ AC$ and $ BD$. Show that if $ \angle POQ= 90^\circ$ then $ PO$ is the bisector of $ \angle AOD$ ...