Skip to main content

Let's complex bash Part 2:P

 Okie so continuing from the previous post ( sorry for huge time gap, got stuck in Allen stuff)

A warning though if anyone from the "anti-bash" community is reading, sorry in advance and R.I.P. 


Notes:-

1. We have $z_1=r_1e^{i\theta_1}$ and $z_2=r_2e^{i\theta_2}$ then we have $z_1z_2=r_1r_2e^{i(\theta_1+\theta_2)}$ and we get $|z_1z_2|=|z_1||z_2|$ and $\arg z_1z_2=\arg z_1+\arg z_2 .$

SPIRAL SIMILARITIES and TRANSFORMATIONS:-

2. How to rotate a point about origin by 90.

  • If $90^{\circ}$ anti-clockwise then multiply the number by $i$ 
  • If $90^{\circ}$ clockwise then multiply by $-i.$
Proof:- Note that $i= 0+1\cdot i.$ So $|i|= \sqrt{0^2+1^2}=1.$ And when we locate $i$ in complex plane, clearly $\arg i=\pi/2.$

Similarly for the second, but note that $\arg -i=-\pi /2.$ (Since angles are measured anti-clockwise)

Example:- Here we have $z=1+2i$ then when we multiply $i$ we get $zi=i-2.$

Now, what about we want to dialate a point from one to another and scale it? (Note that that is spiral similarity only :P)



Like say we want to rotate point $z=4+5i$ about point $x=2+2i$ with dilation of $\pi/2.$

In this case what we do is we shift the whole diagram such that $x$ to $(0,0).$ Here we have $(2,2)\rightarrow (0,0),$ so $z$ goes to $z=(4,5)\rightarrow z'=(4-2,5-2)=(2,3)= 2+3i.$

Now we perform the same thing, so we will multiply $i$ and we get $z''=i-3=(-3,2).$
Then we transform it back, so we get $z''=(-3,2)\rightarrow z'''=(-3+2,2+2)=(-1,4).$



So in summary, what we are doing is shifting the $x$ to $O$ i.e in all the coordinates we subtracting $x$'s coordinates.. and then we get the new image of $z,$ we multiply $i,$ get new image, of $(z-x)$ then add the coordinates back .

So we get $\boxed{z\rightarrow i(z-x)+x.}$

Here $i$'s modulus is one, so there hasn't been a scaling thingy but we can do that too. 

$$z\rightarrow \alpha(z-w)+w$$ 

This is a spiral similarity centrerd at $w$ dilating $z$ which rotates by $\alpha $ and dilates by $|\alpha |.$

COMPLEX REFLECTION:- 

Let $W$ be the reflection of $Z$ over a given $AB.$ Then

$$w=\frac{  (a-b)\overline{z} + \overline{a}b - a\overline{b}}{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})}$$

Proof:- It's in egmo:P.

We first transform $z$ to $z-a$ ( We have the motive to turn $\overline{AB}$ in to the segment between $0$ and $1$ on the real axis, so that we can then apply complex conjugate thing that we have on reflection about real axis)

Then we down everything by $b-a.$

So we get $$\left(\frac{w-a}{b-a}\right) = \overline{\left(\frac{z-a}{b-a}\right)}$$

Using the basic conjugate properties, we get,

$$ \overline{\left(\frac{z-a}{b-a}\right)}=\left(\frac{\bar{z}-\bar {a}}{\bar{b}-\bar{a}}\right)$$

Then calcs done, we get $$w=\frac{  (a-b)\overline{z} + \overline{a}b - a\overline{b}}{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})}$$

Then we get this problem from egmo :P

Problem:- Show that the foot of the altitude from $Z$ to $\overline{AB}$ is given by

$$ \frac{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})z + (a-b)\overline{z} + \overline{a}b - a\overline{b}}{2(\overline{a} - \overline{b})} $$

Proof:-Consider the reflection of $z$ say $w.$ Then we know that the foot ( say $x$) will be the midpoint of $z$ and $w$ i.e $x=\frac{z+w}{2}.$

Now, using the reflection lemma, we get $$w+z=\frac{ (a-b)\overline{z} + \overline{a}b - a\overline{b}}{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})}+ z=\frac{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})z + (a-b)\overline{z} + \overline{a}b - a\overline{b}}{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})} $$

So $$\frac{w+z}{2}=  \frac{(\overline{a} - \overline{b})z + (a-b)\overline{z} + \overline{a}b - a\overline{b}}{2(\overline{a} - \overline{b})}$$

Properties:-
  • $z=\bar{z}$ iff $z$ is real
  • $z+\bar{z}=0 $ iff $z$ is pure imaginary  
perpendicular criterion:- The compleplex numbers $a,b,c,d$ have the property $AB\perp CD$ if and only if
$$\frac{d-c}{b-a} + \overline{\left(\frac{d-c}{b-a}\right)}=0$$

Proof:- We transform $d\rightarrow d-c, c \rightarrow 0.$ Now, this transformation takes line $CD$ to a line parallel to it, passing through origin.

Similarly, we transform $d\rightarrow d-c, c \rightarrow 0.$ Now, this transformation takes line $CD$ to a line parallel to it, passing through origin.

Now, remember in the previous spiral similarity transformation, we noticed that multiplying the complex number with $xi$ transforms line to a perpendicular line. So if $d-c$ and $b-a$ are perpendicular then  $\frac{d-c}{b-a}$ must be pure imaginary.

Using the properties, we get that  $$\frac{d-c}{b-a} + \overline{\left(\frac{d-c}{b-a}\right)}=0.$$

Collinearity Lemma:- Prove that complex numbers $z$, $a$ and $b$ are collinear iff

$$ \frac{z-a}{z-b} = \overline{\left(\frac{z-a}{z-b}\right)} $$

Proof:- We consider the transformation $z-a$ and $z-b.$ These vectors have tails in $O$ and heads as $z-a, z-b$ respectively. Now note that if $z,a,b$ are collinear then these two vectors ( because the transformation is mapping into parallel line through $O$) 
So we have the angles between these two vectors as $0, \pi.$

Hence the two vectors' quotient must be a real number. Using Proposition 6.4, we get that 

$$\frac{z-a}{z-b} + \overline{\left(\frac{z-a}{z-b}\right)}=0.$$

Complex shoelace Formula:- If $a,b,c$ are complex numbers, then the signed area of triangle $ABC$ is given by 





THE UNIT CIRCLE:-

The unit circle is the set of complex numbers $z$ with $|z|=1,$ which is centred at $0$ with radius $1.$

We have for any $z$ on the unit circle, $\boxed{\bar {z}=\frac{1}{z}}.$
This is because $z\cdot \bar{z}=|z|^2.$

----

Yeah now lemme do polynomials :P  

See ya next time! Also do check my other blog (if you get free time tmrw, new post coming there )

Sunaina 💜

Comments

  1. Where actually is the bash you just posted the thm's right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No bashing is the best,also even bashes are beautiful sometimes for eg check Mr Oreo Juice/nathantareep's (shameless advertising)/jj_ca888 solution to Romania TST 2007 Day 6 P2(by Cosmin Pohoata)

      Delete
    2. lol!! Now I know who you are :sunglasses:.. I tbh cant bash in an exam condition, so i felt it's not that useful to learn plus I dont even have specific interest! Also Oreo doing bash :O dang he must be high!

      Delete
    3. @bove lol tru :rotfl:!I ve never literally talked to him(maybe bcoz I don't use discord) but I have seen him write that in his posts :P.Yah I am not that good too in bashes.Just learning.

      Also complex bash is tough :(

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My experiences at EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience

Yes, I know. This post should have been posted like 2 months ago. Okay okay, sorry. But yeah, I was just waiting for everything to be over and I was lazy. ( sorry ) You know, the transitioning period from high school to college is very weird. I will join CMI( Chennai Mathematical  Institue) for bsc maths and cs degree. And I am very scared. Like very very scared. No, not about making new friends and all. I don't care about that part because I know a decent amount of CMI people already.  What I am scared of is whether I will be able to handle the coursework and get good grades T_T Anyways, here's my EGMO PDC, EGMO, IMOTC and PROMYS experience. Yes, a lot of stuff. My EGMO experience is a lot and I wrote a lot of details, IMOTC and PROMYS is just a few paras. Oh to those, who don't know me or are reading for the first time. I am Sunaina Pati. I was IND2 at EGMO 2023 which was held in Slovenia. I was also invited to the IMOTC or International Mathematical Olympiad Training Cam...

How to prepare for RMO?

"Let's wait for this exam to get over".. *Proceeds to wait for 2 whole fricking years!  I always wanted to write a book recommendation list, because I have been asked so many times! But then I was always like "Let's wait for this exam to get over" and so on. Why? You see it's pretty embarrassing to write a "How to prepare for RMO/INMO" post and then proceed to "fail" i.e not qualifying.  Okay okay, you might be thinking, "Sunaina you qualified like in 10th grade itself, you will obviously qualify in 11th and 12th grade." No. It's not that easy. Plus you are talking to a very underconfident girl. I have always underestimated myself. And I think that's the worst thing one can do itself. Am I confident about myself now? Definitely not but I am learning not to self-depreciate myself little by little. Okay, I shall write more about it in the next post describing my experience in 3 different camps and 1 program.  So, I got...

Symmetric Polynomials #week 6

Well... I haven't seen much symmetric polynomials in Olympiads, but still I am learning, because I found them cute. And I am basically using this blog as my notes :P What are symmetric polynomials?  One can understand this with  examples. If we are considering over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then  $$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3=x_1^2\cdot x_2^3\cdot x_3+x_1^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_3+x_2^2\cdot x_3^3\cdot x_1+x_3^2\cdot x_1^3\cdot x_2.$$ See? $3!$ terms! Let's take one more example with again over 3 variables, $x_1,x_2,x_3$ then $$\sum_{sym}x_1^2\cdot x_2^2= x_1^2\cdot x_2^2+x_1^2\cdot x_3^2+x_2^2\cdot x_1^2+x_2^2\cdot x_3^2+x_3^2\cdot x_1^2+x_3^2\cdot x_2^2$$ Wait.. why 2 times ? So basically what happens in symmetrictric sums, is we go through all $n!$ possible permutations. So, here we have $a^2\cdot b^2\cdot c^0$ as like the "general" form type, right? Now, list down all the $3!=6$ permutations of $x_1,x_2,x_3$, and put them in the gene...

IMO Shortlist 2021 C1

 I am planning to do at least one ISL every day so that I do not lose my Olympiad touch (and also they are fun to think about!). Today, I tried the 2021 IMO shortlist C1.  (2021 ISL C1) Let $S$ be an infinite set of positive integers, such that there exist four pairwise distinct $a,b,c,d \in S$ with $\gcd(a,b) \neq \gcd(c,d)$. Prove that there exist three pairwise distinct $x,y,z \in S$ such that $\gcd(x,y)=\gcd(y,z) \neq \gcd(z,x)$. Suppose not. Then any $3$ elements $x,y,z\in S$ will be $(x,y)=(y,z)=(x,z)$ or $(x,y)\ne (y,z)\ne (x,z)$. There exists an infinite set $T$ such that $\forall x,y\in T,(x,y)=d,$ where $d$ is constant. Fix a random element $a$. Note that $(x,a)|a$. So $(x,a)\le a$.Since there are infinite elements and finite many possibilities for the gcd (atmost $a$). So $\exists$ set $T$ which is infinite such that $\forall b_1,b_2\in T$ $$(a,b_1)=(a,b_2)=d.$$ Note that if $(b_1,b_2)\ne d$ then we get a contradiction as we get a set satisfying the proble...

Solving Random ISLs And Sharygin Solutions! And INMO happened!!

Some of the ISLs I did before INMO :P  [2005 G3]:  Let $ABCD$ be a parallelogram. A variable line $g$ through the vertex $A$ intersects the rays $BC$ and $DC$ at the points $X$ and $Y$, respectively. Let $K$ and $L$ be the $A$-excenters of the triangles $ABX$ and $ADY$. Show that the angle $\measuredangle KCL$ is independent of the line $g$ Solution: Note that $$\Delta LDK \sim \Delta XBK$$ and $$\Delta ADY\sim \Delta XCY.$$ So we have $$\frac{BK}{DY}=\frac{XK}{LY}$$ and $$\frac{DY}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}=\frac{AY}{XY}.$$ Hence $$\frac{BK}{CY}=\frac{AD}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}\implies \frac{BK}{BC}=\frac{CY}{XC}\times \frac{XK}{LY}=\frac{AB}{BC}\times \frac{XK}{LY} $$ $$\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{XK}{BK}=\frac{AB}{LY}\times \frac{LY}{DY}=\frac{AB}{DL}$$ $$\implies \Delta CBK\sim \Delta LDK$$ And we are done. We get that $$\angle KCL=360-(\angle ACB+\angle DKC+\angle BCK)=\angle DAB/2 +180-\angle DAB=180-\angle DAB/2$$ Motivation: I took a hint on this. I had other angles but I did...

New year with a new beginning! And a recap of 2024..and all the best for INMO 2025!

Hi everyone! Happy New Year :)  Thank you so much for 95k+ views!!! How was everyone's 2024? What are everyone's resolutions? ( Do write down in the comment section! And you can come back 1 year later to see if you made them possible!). A Better Mathematician  Well, technically a theoretical computer scientist.  I am so grateful to be allowed to study at CMI where I can interact with so many brilliant professors, access the beautiful library and obviously discuss mathematics ( sometimes non math too ) with the students.    And this year, I want to learn more mathematics and clear my fundamentals. I have become much worse in math actually. And hopefully, read some research papers too :)  And discuss a lot of mathematics with other people.  However, with that whole depressing 2024 year, I have lost a lot of my confidence in mathematics. And to be a better mathematician, I should gain the confidence that I can be a mathematician. And well, I am working on...

Some Geometry Problems for everyone to try!

 These problems are INMO~ish level. So trying this would be a good practice for INMO!  Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral. Let $M,N,P,Q$ be the midpoints of sides $AB,BC,CD,DA$. Prove that $MNPQ$ is a parallelogram. Consider $\Delta ABD$ and $\Delta BDC$ .Note that $NP||BD||MQ$. Similarly, $NM||AC||PQ$. Hence the parallelogram. In $\Delta ABC$, $\angle A$ be right. Let $D$ be the foot of the altitude from $A$ onto $BC$. Prove that $AD^2=BD\cdot CD$. Note that $\Delta ADB\sim \Delta CDA$. So by similarity, we have $$\frac{AD}{BD}=\frac{CD}{AD}.$$ In $\Delta ABC$, $\angle A$ be right. Let $D$ be the foot of the altitude from $A$ onto $BC$. Prove that $AD^2=BD\cdot CD$. Let $D\in CA$, such that $AD = AB$.Note that $BD||AS$. So by the Thales’ Proportionality Theorem, we are done! Given $\Delta ABC$, construct equilateral triangles $\Delta BCD,\Delta CAE,\Delta ABF$ outside of $\Delta ABC$. Prove that $AD=BE=CF$. This is just congruence. N...

IMO Shortlist 2022 C1

  Today we shall try IMO Shortlist $2022$ C1. A $\pm 1$-sequence is a sequence of $2022$ numbers $a_1, \ldots, a_{2022},$ each equal to either $+1$ or $-1$. Determine the largest $C$ so that, for any $\pm 1$-sequence, there exists an integer $k$ and indices $1 \le t_1 < \ldots < t_k \le 2022$ so that $t_{i+1} - t_i \le 2$ for all $i$, and$$\left| \sum_{i = 1}^{k} a_{t_i} \right| \ge C.$$ We claim that the answer is $\boxed{506}$. $506$ is the upper bound. Just consider the sequence $$+1,-1,-1,+1,+1,-1,-1,+1\dots,-1,-1,+1,+1,-1.$$ Here $1, -1, -1, 1$ is repeated $505$ times and $1,-1$ is concatted to it. Now,our sequence would be $a_1,a_3,a_4,a_5,a_7,\dots$ which on summing would give $506$. And clearly, this would give the upper bound. Now, we show that $506$ is attainable by every sequence. WLOG there are at least $1011$ positive numbers in the sequence. Then we choose $+1$ whenever we can. Let the sequence be $c_1,b_1,\dots, c_n,b_n$ where $c_i$ are ...

Just spam combo problems cause why not

This post is mainly for Rohan Bhaiya. He gave me/EGMO contestants a lot and lots of problems. Here are solutions to a very few of them.  To Rohan Bhaiya: I just wrote the sketch/proofs here cause why not :P. I did a few more extra problems so yeah.  I sort of sorted the problems into different sub-areas, but it's just better to try all of them! I did try some more combo problems outside this but I tried them in my tablet and worked there itself. So latexing was tough. Algorithms  "Just find the algorithm" they said and they died.  References:  Algorithms Pset by Abhay Bestrapalli Algorithms by Cody Johnson Problem1: Suppose the positive integer $n$ is odd. First Al writes the numbers $1, 2,\dots, 2n$ on the blackboard. Then he picks any two numbers $a, b$ erases them, and writes, instead, $|a - b|$. Prove that an odd number will remain at the end.  Proof: Well, we go $\mod 2$. Note that $$|a-b|\equiv a+b\mod 2\implies \text{ the final number is }1+2+\dots ...

Problems I did this week [Jan8-Jan14]

Yeyy!! I am being so consistent with my posts~~ Here are a few problems I did the past week and yeah INMO going to happen soon :) All the best to everyone who is writing!  I wont be trying any new problems and will simply revise stuffs :) Some problems here are hard. Try them yourself and yeah~~Solutions (with sources) are given at the end! Problems discussed in the blog post Problem1: Let $ABC$ be a triangle whose incircle $\omega$ touches sides $BC, CA, AB$ at $D,E,F$ respectively. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of $DEF$ and let altitude $DH$ intersect $\omega$ again at $P$ and $EF$ intersect $BC$ at $L$. Let the circumcircle of $BPC$ intersect $\omega$ again at $X$. Prove that points $L,D,H,X$ are concyclic. Problem 2: Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrangle, $ P$ the intersection of lines $ AB$ and $ CD$, $ Q$ the intersection of lines $ AD$ and $ BC$ and $ O$ the intersection of diagonals $ AC$ and $ BD$. Show that if $ \angle POQ= 90^\circ$ then $ PO$ is the bisector of $ \angle AOD$ ...